MOTOGP » Edwards explains Schumacher speed.

MOTOGP » Edwards explains Schumacher speed.

Here:

<B>Edwards explains Schumacher speed.</B>

Here:

<B>Edwards explains Schumacher speed.</B>

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

SPONSORED RELATED SEARCHES

MOTORSPORT

INTERACTIVE

SERVICES


NewsPicsWeb	SEARCH

REGISTER | LOG-IN

HOME F1 MOTOGP CARS BIKES PICTURES GRID GIRLS VIDEO

»

29 agree. 4 disagree.

chu said: "but the chship was clearly influenced big time by tyre and bike differences"

And it never was when Rossi was winning? Bull***** That guy had so many advantages handed to him it was ridiculous!

Michelin wins for 40 years straight, it's cool.
Bridgestone wins one year, change the rules.

Honda wins for several years in a row with Rossi on board, it's exciting.
Honda wins with Hayden on board, change the rules.
Ducati wins one year with Stoner on board: PLEASE CHANGE THE RULES!!!!!

Rossi wins for 5 years, it's Rossi and exciting.
Hayden and Stoner win for two years, it's boring, it's the bike, it's the tires, change the rules.

C'mon... Get a grip.

Posted by Hopkins Fan - Unregistered (734 days ago)

How did Michael Schumacher lap just five seconds slower than the MotoGP lap record?

» Read The Full Story

Add Comment

8 agree. 7 disagree.

Well there you go. To go fast you have to turn it down. Since Stoner was the fastest then he must have had it turned down the most. This certainly puts to rest the BS that has been sprouted about Stoner being no good if he didn't have TC.

Wonder what the doubters will come up with now!

Posted by Parker - Unregistered (734 days ago)

1 agrees. 2 disagree.

Parker the reason Stoner is soooo good he was raised on Emu Eggs and Kangaroo Steaks, therefore he had the advantage over all non Aussie riders,just wait till the Europeans get their teeth into a Kangaroo that is if they can catch one thats traction control

Posted by Saltbush - Unregistered (734 days ago)

3 agree. 2 disagree.

YES!! THANK YOU COLIN!

Agree wholeheartedly, Parker. The Casey doubters will have to look for another excuse. This also fits quite nicely with Hayden's comments about doing the best when he turned the electronics down.

Posted by Hopkins Fan - Unregistered (734 days ago)

14 agree. 12 disagree.

******** - Has he tried the Ducati? NO! then wtf does he know..

How come Casey never won a chship until he rode an electronic aided monster?

Posted by chu - Unregistered (734 days ago)

3 agree. 1 disagrees.

There we go, another silly discussion about who's better starts... :rolleyes:

Posted by Morgue - Unregistered (734 days ago)

13 agree. 2 disagree.

"wtf does he know..."

I would have thought having ridden in MotoGP for the past five years Edwards would know exactly what he is talking about... He certainly knows a lot more than Dovizioso or any of us that post here...

Posted by Team Green (734 days ago)
Last Edited 734 days ago

1 agrees. 7 disagree.

He also said at the start of the season that Rossi and him would kick *** this year. Colin s lost all his credibility.
Every relevant bike mag in europe has tried the moto gp bikes. Read the reviews and check which one s tipped as the easiest to ride.
Dead horse though.

Posted by chu - Unregistered (734 days ago)

2 agree. 2 disagree.

Just for the record, I am not a Stoner fan but I don't think TC helped him this year. His background is all about throttle control form the dirt tracks (correct me if I'm wrong Antipodeans).

Posted by jh - Unregistered (734 days ago)

2 agree. 3 disagree.

Chu ... i imagine the Yamaha is being mooted by Journos as the easiest to ride , that is the case at the pace journalists ride at , when they are running 10-15 seconds a lap slower than a race time i'm sure the bike is easy , it's when it get's to racing speeds it may change ( also easy to ride may = slow !! )
As for Ducati , of course that had traction control , never ever saw him slide the rear out of a corner ( in the wet @ Melbourne Loop at Donington he just drove outta that corner with no slip at all , Yam had wheelspin as did Honda's !! )
Casey was still quality though as the other 3 Dukes were nowhere.

Posted by Timbo - Unregistered (734 days ago)

2 agree. 2 disagree.

But i never said Casey wasnt good. I do say he s not 150 points better than Pedrosa or Rossi.
As for the othe rdukes, to me Loris is finioshed, seriously. Barros ... nebver got a MaMa tech for eectronics or a suspension tech, plus after beating Casey at Mugello, Domenicali told d'antin that his riders weer not going to end in front of the factory again.. Hoffmann is not a top level guy anyway.
Again im not saying Casey didnt deserve, but the chship was clearly influenced big time by tyre and bike differences

Posted by chu - Unregistered (734 days ago)

Page 1 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 › »

List Topics

Add Comment

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us using the [Report Abuse] function next to the offending comment post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service will be edited or removed with immediate effect. Crash Media Group prohibits defamatory posts.

^ Skip to Top

Car Insurance	MotoGP Tickets
Car Hire	Car Parts
Cars For Sale	Loans
Used Cars

MOTORSPORT

F1

NASCAR

WRC

WTCC

Indycar

GP2

Renault WS

Sportscars

F3

DTM

BTCC

V8 Supercars

A1GP

Rally UK

MotoGP

WSBK

BSB

Moto-X

INTERACTIVE

Audio

Podcasts

Have Your Say

Polls

RSS Newsfeeds

Make Homepage

Contact Us

Jobs

Free Screensavers

Official Links

Unofficial Links

Race Cars for Sale

SERVICES

Bike Insurance

Motorcycle Insurance

Motoring Experiences

Motorcycling Experiences

Loans