Q&A: Valentino Rossi
Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

3 agree. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
If those of you that beleive Bridgestone will simply not give Rossi the best they have you must be joking.

Someone mentioned that Stoner was not that impressed with rossi on his first test on the bridgestones & he's on his own.

I would point this out to you.

No1, Stoner is hardly likely to admitt he's worried about Rossi switching to bridgestone, I bet he's chocked because of it I know i would be.

No2, Bridgestone are a proffesional outfit, fully used to motor racing & they know exactly what they have taken on with Rossi, I bet they are laughing what a coo, & they will be working as hard with Valentino as Casey.

If the Yamaha engineers have done their job were gonna be in for 1 cont..
Posted by Nigel Tasker (656 days ago)
Recommended Comment
Sort Comments: Oldest   |   Newest

MOTOGP » Q&A: Valentino Rossi

The following Q&A with MotoGP superstar Valentino Rossi was provided by Fiat Yamaha at the team's 2008 launch, held at Turin in Italy on Friday.

Add Comment

Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
It now seems apparent that the 08 bike is, in main, the late spec 07 bike with pneumatic valves and more aero efficiency. Personally I think his tyre switch could be entirely related to that fact, why else would he say they needed more power only weeks from the 08 bikes unveiling...they haven''t got the power but HAD to try the now dominant''ish tyres. In the end of year ''try outs'' of all motogp bikes, Kevin Schwantz points out that the Yamaha seemed the least ''held back'' by electronics, as Rossi likes his own control of the bike but these systems can now make up the difference between ''most talented'' and a ''genius'' rider. I for one look forward to seeing any difference between Yamahas Michelin and Bridgestone runners but it''ll be harder work for Rossi now as no data to back him up..Rossi at a slight disadvantage eh ( ?? ) but that''s why he''ll be all the more worth watching. Dean.
Posted by Dean Dean (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree.
Report Abuse
rossi used to work alone, may be that's his strength
Posted by MAT MAT (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
The Ducati is the biggest bike there, and the fastest, The Yamaha has the smallest fairing and is the slowest,
So now Yamaha have a greater front fairing area to cut the wind and reduce drag (elbow, head and shoulders), top speed will increase.
For a major manufacture yamaha sure get heaps wrong???????

It was screamingly obvious when Hayden got a bigger fairing last year and immediatly went faster in the straights.
Posted by Ace27 - Unregistered (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
What makes you think the M1 has the smallest fairing?
It is aerodynamically optimized for the longest men in the field (1.80 m and 1.79m)
don't you think they ran windtunnel tests?
Look at sideview pictures of Lorenzo on the bike, he disappears behind it
The ducati is narrow and has a higher screen (didn't Casey get a new fairing at Philip Island where he complained about the wind? Casey is also not a very tall guy and fits perfectly on that bike.
It also has a bit to do with the engine, a V4 builds narrower than an inkine four.
Posted by The Morgue (657 days ago)
Last Edited 657 days ago
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
The Yamaha increased the size of their fairing midway through last year in a desparate attempt to extract more kph from the bike.
Posted by j h (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Yes, the '08 fairing seems to be an evolution of that one,
you can see the difference between the Ducati and the Yamaha in the picture on the frontcover of the '07 Motocourse book.
Posted by The Morgue (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Carefull here people, increasing the size and therefore the cross sectional area of a fairing would slow the bike down. It's the reduction in drag coefficient that is the important issue, as the force required to travel at a particular speed (read that as the power output of the bike) is proportional to the cross sectional area x drag coefficient. So if you can make a smaller fairing with the same coeffiecient, then you go faster, whereas increasing the size requires a lower coefficient to do the same. Like a lot of designs work, it's a trade off.
Posted by Al - Unregistered (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
The most foward point of the fairing acts like a bulbous hull creating a larger hole in the air for the rest of the mass to pass through (to a point) it is the rest of the mass, the head, elbows, feet/foot pegs, knee's etc that add to the drag. Remember its not just frontal aero but diaganal and sideways drag as well as up to 60' lean angle. So there is a sweet spot the manufacture are still learning about, but the smaller the fairing the greater the drag, and pf course we cant leave out the oppersite, on overly large fairing will do the same in a different way.

Something I should have started with is: Car aero is mostly irrelevent here.
Posted by Ace27 - Unregistered (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
Yes aerodynamics are a real black art and up to now somthing bike racing has not really explored (except for the dustbin fairings of the 50's (?) Moto Guzzis.
Posted by j h (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Isn't it funny how Rossi doesn't even mention Hayden as one of his obvious title threats in the article. LOL

No respect at all IMO. or maybe just being realistic....??
Posted by Ozzie Boy - Unregistered (657 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 1 of 4
1 2 3 4  »
Have Your Say Comments


Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us using the [Report Abuse] function next to the offending comment post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service will be edited or removed with immediate effect. Crash Media Group prohibits defamatory posts.
 
Site Map
© 1999 - 2009 Crash Media Group
The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.

Contact Crash.Net  |  Advertise on Crash.Net  |  Our Privacy Policy  |  About Crash.Net  |  Get News Feeds  |  Need a Website?

Find car reviews on sports cars such as Ferrari, BMW, Porsche and many more.