MotoGP » Crash.net's MotoGP top ten: 2nd


Dani Pedrosa 2nd in Crash.net's top 10 MotoGP riders of 2010.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

Mistersofty - Unregistered

November 19, 2010 10:08 AM

Say what you like d###s above but the guys is fast, has balls o steel and will be very strong on the Honda next year.

What do you wish I'll on a guy that can push up front and worry the yams ? we're here for racing and entertainment, not to get personal ?

proud spaniard - Unregistered

November 19, 2010 10:20 AM

Pedrosa has been the fastest Honda rider consistently. True.
Pedrosa has had better material than Dovizioso all season. Also true. Let's just remember the race at Motegi when Dovizioso was given a better engine that Pedrosa was supposed to get before his injury.
The Honda is the fastest bike on the grid. Sooooo true, both in acceleration and top speed. Had Yamaha answered earlier to Rossi's and Lorenzo's demands for more power, Pedrosa wouldn't have won more than his usual two races: Mugello and Indy.
Pedrosa has had for years a bike built around him that doesn't suit well the other Honda riders. True.
Pedrosa+Puig=the Axis of Evil. They are such b1tches with the teammates that make Rossi look all friendly and sh1t.
Next year Stoner will whip Pedrosa's ass. No question about it.
The guy is fast--on the fastest bike--, but inconsistent, can't fight for sh1t, can ride on a bad set up--unlike Lorenzo or Stoner--and is a supreme whiner. Luckily for him he's found his sugardaddy in Repsol.

xoxo - Unregistered

November 19, 2010 10:26 AM

oic proud spaniard..

if i'm not mistaken, casey also not consistent.. and he has lot of dnf compare to dani..oic..i guess u didnt watch moto gp races or if u did, maybe u slept during the races..

Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 4 5  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.