BSB » Battle underway for final 'Showdown' spot

Laverty leads Seeley on paper, but the Relentless Suzuki rider inches ahead when dropped scores are taken into account.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

cruachan - Unregistered

July 21, 2010 12:52 PM

Glad as I am to see a competitive championship compared to the last 2 years, Easton is the one I want to see get in. If he can get some reliability out of his bike I think he'll still be in with a real shout of the title come the showdown, he's a real demon around both Croft and Oulton.

roadking03 - Unregistered

July 21, 2010 3:03 PM

A healthy Ellison was my choice for the championship this year,but it was'nt to be....So not sure who to root for!!Just hoping for some good clean racing,with some close finishes.
RACE ON,and may the best man win

Phil - Unregistered

July 21, 2010 5:52 PM

The first season in many years that doesnt actually need fixing to make it exciting. Look at the leaderboard without the dropped scores. It would have been a good close championship anyway!
Bin them for next year?

Randall M - Unregistered

July 21, 2010 7:52 PM

John Laverty 129(119) 1 Podium 3rd= +1 & 8 Top 6 Alistair Seeley 128 (124) 2 3rds = +2 & 6 Top 6 Finishes, Rooting for Laverty but QUestion is the drop rule drop 2 out of the first 9 rounds?

Sick Cylinder - Unregistered

July 21, 2010 8:53 PM

Well said Phil - this new points scheme is ridiculous and I hope it is dropped.

there are so many interesting things playing out this season - Tommy Hill having trouble setting up the electronics and running without them, Brookes coming on strong are just two of them - a perfectly good championship could very well be ruind by the *****ic meddling of the clowns who introduced this new systems.

Page 1 of 2
1 2  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.