BTCC » BTCC reveals 2010 race dates


Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

FooAtari - Unregistered

October 08, 2009 6:35 AM

Why don't they at least use the Silverstone International circuit, instead of the National, if not the full GP circuit...

Also, the should swap the Brands rounds around, have the Indy first, then finish the season with the GP circuit, great way to end the year.

Dennis H - Unregistered

October 08, 2009 7:03 PM


Maybe, drop Donington now to give time for a alternative circuit to be found, as I'm sure it will be a building site still in Sep! They will be trying to convince evryone it will be ready for the 2011 British Grand Prix.

What a dump! It's one round I would never go to!

MPH - Unregistered

October 08, 2009 11:35 PM

Pembrey is very near to where I live the championship came twice to the venue in the 90's.
It is a great track with the right amount of bends and a good straight.
The problem back then and now is a complete lack of room for the paddock and the facilities are extremely poor.
Which is a shame as most top drivers have said it is one of the best places they have raced.

Matt Auger

October 09, 2009 4:59 PM

AndyHew01: Having seen the Anglesey circuit (not with a race on it), the paddock is no way near big enough to cater for 20+ BTCC teams just tyre lorries as well as the hundreds of support race lorries and their tyre suppliers.

And access is pretty awful as well - the track and layout would be good for a BTCC race though.

Graham Hart - Unregistered

October 11, 2009 7:39 PM

Good ideas people especially the brands hatch idea. Im glad rockingham is earlier in the year it is a great place to go. havent got long to go before its on again. Castle Combe anyone?

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.