It seems that for some it's heads Jenson loses, tails the other guys win. If he'd kept that car advantage he had at the start of the season, no doubt he wouldn't deserve it because it was the best car. Now that the others have clearly caught and passed the Brawn in terms of development, he's criticized for pulling unlikely points finishes out of the bag against the odds to retain a championship lead he's held for the entire season.

It seems that, in some people's eyes, Rubens would be a more worthy champion because, in an identical car, he totally failed to win six of the first seven races but did a bit better later on. Or Vettel because his season has been almost the reverse of Jenson's, with rookie mistakes and poor luck early in the season, and better form - in a better car - now. Strange reasoning.

Fact is, any one of them would be a worthy champion, because any one of them can score enough points. End of story.