F1 » Ferrari to 'consider' F1 commitment post-2012

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest


October 09, 2009 10:51 AM

surprised at the anti ferrari comments. but dont forget, if ferrari and luca had not taken a stance, then mad max would probably be continuing to be in control and changing the rules every day.formula 1 needs ferrari and ferrari need formula 1. to lose them woulf hurt the sport.


October 09, 2009 11:10 AM
Last Edited 324 days ago

Iam a Mercedes-Benz nut as everyone knows by now.
So i comment in peace on this!

If Luca is truly genuine about this and doesnt take uni-lateral action then iam all for change. The aero changes imposed by the FIA have made no difference at all and much to the teams expense. In addition the FIA's flagship initiative KERS has faltered with ZERO support from the FIA where they could have made the system a real boon by giving it more power or a couple of seconds more use per lap. Again the teams footed the bill for it to the tune of hundreds of millions! Then the FIA want to cut costs? Laughable.

The big players Ferrari Mclaren etc need ideas quickly and implement them before F1 becomes GP2.

Rus the Bus - Unregistered

October 09, 2009 11:17 AM

This is a simple case of Ferrari making every effort to ensure that Todt is elected. They know that with the Arab Nations now supporting the Vattenen bid for the FIA presidency that there's a possibility that their man won't get the top job. So what better way to make world motor sport leaders vote for Todt than to infer that Ferrari are likely to exit F1 and that JT only can save the day! Pure politics - Ferrari need F1 just as much as the sport benefits from their long involvement to-date.


October 09, 2009 11:43 AM

Ferrari's worth in Formula 1 is overblown.
They are a glorified Fiat outfit in all honesty.
They have huge clout for no other reason than being Ferrari. If other teams benefited from such preference isnt it surprising there may be some anti-bias against them?

cmarkr - Unregistered

October 09, 2009 11:48 AM

Fred1 - what are you talking about? Computer systems are what the F1 teams use for their R&D - car manufacturers use F1 for R&D just as much as they did when all they had was wind tunnels and test tracks. The issue is that spending money on R&D to make an F1 car go faster isn't necessarily of any commercial use to the major manufacturers of mass market road cars. The banning of refueling is an attempt at bridging this gap which should attract some manufacturers, but unfortunately it's negative for F1 racing. If we get more independants back in the sport, the need to keep the manufacturers happy will be reduced and the sport can concentrate on being a spectacle again!

Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 4 5  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.