F1 » Angry Schumi rejects claims he doesn't race fair


He has been back in the F1 spotlight for barely a month, but already Mercedes Grand Prix 2010 signing Michael Schumacher has found himself on the receiving end of some rather uncomfortable questions...

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

Shura - Unregistered

January 27, 2010 6:43 AM

If Shumi werent banned for two races in 94, he would have dominated anyway. Alonso wont be a match if the car isnt good, plus ferrari will have equal treatment to both drivers (hopefully) and if Massa starts beatin him he is gonna get jealous about it, like when Fisi was sometimes infront he would blast Flavio with anger, fortunetely it wasnt heard on tv but there are ways to hear some of the stuff he said...

InvalidCharacter - Unregistered

January 27, 2010 7:01 AM

Statistically

Percentage of pole positions per total F1 races entered throughout career
1 FANGIO Juan Manuel 54,72
2 CLARK Jim 45,21
3 ASCARI Alberto 42,42
4 SENNA Ayrton 40,12
5 HAMILTON Lewis 32,69
6 SCHUMACHER Michael 27,20
7 MOSS Stirling 23,53
8 STEWART Jackie 16,83
9 MANSELL Nigel 16,67
10 HILL Damon 16,39


Percentage of victories per total F1 races entered throughout career
1 FANGIO Juan Manuel 45,28
2 ASCARI Alberto 39,39
3 SCHUMACHER Michael 36,40
4 CLARK Jim 34,25
5 STEWART Jackie 26,73
6 SENNA Ayrton 25,31
7 PROST Alain 25,25
8 MOSS Stirling 23,53
9 HAMILTON Lewis 21,15
10 HILL Damon 18,03

mike hunt - Unregistered

January 27, 2010 7:44 AM

One can hope that he gets back a portion of the 'respect' he has given out to others in the past....

Damien Hill knows all about this Schumacher certainly respected him

The Truth - Unregistered

January 27, 2010 7:55 AM

Rob01, your a clown. on page 6 you said that Ferrrari got the veto power in 05. Michael stopped driving for Ferrari in 06, so explain to me how the veto helped him win his 5 titles for Ferrari? Your such a hypocrite too, you call Ferrari cheats, but seem to try and say defend Mclaren when they are caught cheating. And quoting Wiki? wtf

And i ask, why is it that the uber Hamilton fans are the ones going on saying, Michael this, Michael that, he is a cheat flawed all this crap. or maybe, just maybe are you afraid Lewis aint going to look so special anymore?

And that is the truth

The Truth - Unregistered

January 27, 2010 8:00 AM

InvalidCharacter

you are aware that Michael started many more races than any of the other guys on that list and thus it is harder for him to have an better strike rate/percentage than them? even still win over a third of the races he entered is a incredible acheivement for a guy who started 250 odd races

richard

January 27, 2010 8:03 AM

it is many, many years since i went to school, but this site reminds me of all the childish arguments in the playgrounbd. "my conker is bigger than yours" "no mine is""no mine is better" etc etc. why so many squabbles and abuse? the season is fast approaching, and looks to be an INTERESTING season. nobody knows who will have a fast car. nobody knows who will have the upper hand.

just calm down and enjoy, and lets have civil and proper discussions.

mike hunt - Unregistered

January 27, 2010 9:27 AM

Not a cheat? Hmm And Monaco was creative interpretation of the rules, bad luck or cheating.

Everyone one knows that he cheats. His career is littered with incidents.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded.

If he tried similar stuff in motorcycle races, he would have been taught as sort, sharp lesson with help from a gravel trap.

will - Unregistered

January 27, 2010 11:51 AM

The Truth , out of interest cd explain your logic about why it wd be harder for Michael to have a higher strike rate because he entered more races, cheers

Page 15 of 21
« 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.