F1 » Berger: Webber tried to take out a title rival in Korea


In an extraordinary claim, former grand prix star Gerhard Berger has accused Red Bull Racing's Mark Webber of trying to take out one of his F1 2010 title rivals in last weekend's inaugural Korean Grand Prix

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest
Filter Comments: All | Registered

107SS2009

October 27, 2010 7:55 PM

All I know is what I had been and am watching.
Mark Weber's car had all wheels not only attached and rotating but all of them in contact with the ground up to the point of contact with Rosberg.

Coach - Unregistered

October 27, 2010 8:07 PM

Ok went back and watched it.. hits wall ALL 4 tyres on the car wetter then hell and the guy has visions of keeping going and salvaging something.. gets it wrong hits Roseberg. ( The Guy I actually cheer for!!!!) did not try to take out Allflanso or Hamilbum.. and anyone that thinks Berger right about anything is a flipping idiot he had all 4 tyres still when he got hit.. give a flippin break.. can't belive anyone bought this rubish but then again Berger had his flap open he sucked as a driver now he sucks as a wanna be newsman.. get a real job Gerhard your finished never was never will be.

Nigelman

October 27, 2010 8:11 PM
Last Edited 1268 days ago

@Mark
What happened in Turkey was Vettels own fault, Webber has all the rights to defend his position, everyone has the right to defend. And if Vettel all of a sudden steers to the right, then thats his decision, but he won't get any better of it.

richard

October 27, 2010 8:26 PM
Last Edited 1268 days ago

sunny. i cannot understand what you have been watching. the utube video which i referred to CLEARLY shows the left rear of webbers car, collapsed, with the right front at least 6 inches clear of the ground, and the car skidding on its plank. the view is from track behing webbers mistake. there is no way he could have had any control of the car.

Mark _

October 27, 2010 8:38 PM

@Nigelman - I agree. The point that I was making is that when Schumi does this he is villified. He did not touch or hinder Rubens yet he got a huge amount of criticism and an unjust penalty for Rubens's overtaking manouver. It is the double standard not the driving style that bothers me the most.

BoB - Unregistered

October 27, 2010 8:49 PM

Looking at the footage on youtube I believe he could of stopped the car going back across the track. As soon as he hits the wall he turns the wheel right hand down, maybe he felt it was a better place to leave the car on the inside of the track where it was less likely to get hit. Or maybe he was just hoping to bump into hamilton.

Alan D - Unregistered

October 27, 2010 8:53 PM

If you look at the outside footage then as he slides back across the track it is clear that the rear suspension is broken and it is likely that one of the rear wheels isn't touching the track.

If you look at the onboard footage you can see from the tyre tread that as he rebounds off the wall, the front wheels are already locked and the front wheels aren't even pointing in the same direction.

With all the water on the track, it is highly likely that once the suspension had gone that he was floating on a film of water between the track and the plank.

Alan D - Unregistered

October 27, 2010 8:59 PM

Furthermore, from the in-car footage, you can see that although he does turn the steering to the left at one point, there is no response from the front wheels. The steering is broken.

bob - Unregistered

October 27, 2010 9:08 PM

if you look at the in car footage you will see when he hits the wall the impact turns the wheel fully to the right, he does turn slightly to the left and you do see the wheels turn very slightly.

Page 7 of 11
« 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.