F1 » McLaren 'serious' about CFD, but it's 'a risk too far' just yet


McLaren Racing managing director Jonathan Neale reveals that whilst unconventional aerodynamic doctrine CFD does have a 'vital' place in F1, the demise of the more traditional wind tunnel is not yet in sight

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

Calvin _

March 01, 2011 11:13 AM

I'm with McLaren on this. CFD plus wind tunnel is the way to go. Those teams who are wholly behind CFD are just that way because they can't afford a wind tunnel. Eventually, a wholly CFD approach may work, but we're not there yet.

richard

March 01, 2011 11:20 AM

cfd is a tool that can be used, but to rely on it completely (like manor) is silly. nothing can replicate actual track time. why do you think that so many cars were using flow paint, different wings , different exhausts etc? because the computers could not replicate actual running conditions.

Marcus Garvey - Unregistered

March 01, 2011 11:29 AM

i agree with Neale but it's only a matter of time. once they have enough real-world data from test days, under all conditions to feed back into the computational model then the wind tunnel will become more and more an unnecessary expense.

I can see that happening in the next four to five years if we have fairly stable aero regs.

Vetti - Unregistered

March 01, 2011 12:26 PM

CFD is the future, no denying that. It's a rather substantial jump from the traditional wind tunnel and may be the lack of a middle generation concept is what troubles McLaren, which is completely understandable.

James Smith-Brown - Unregistered

March 01, 2011 12:35 PM

@Marcus Garvey
It's not about collecting data from test days, it's about the computational complexity of it all. Not even NASA-grade CFD is powerful enough to model air flow in enough detail, at least in a viable amount of time.

James Smith-Brown - Unregistered

March 01, 2011 1:58 PM

@Marcus Garvey
Of course they will improve, I never said otherwise (and it certainly wasn't your initial point).
But even then, a huge increase in power simply isn't enough, I'm not sure if you appreciate quite how computationally difficult all of this is.

If supercomputers in 4-5 years can simulate this stuff accurately enough that teams forget about windtunnels then we should all be very worried- those computers would be able to crack any security on our financial transactions within hours...

Marcus Garvey - Unregistered

March 01, 2011 4:28 PM

@James Smith-Brown
i'm fully aware of the issues surrounding computational modelling it's part of my job. and i still stand by my original prediction that it's just a matter of time.

Page 1 of 3
1 2 3  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.