F1 » Virgin sporting director backs free-to-air F1


Graeme Lowdon argues that F1 needs to remain on free-to-air TV and not go down the pay-per-view route

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

Rod Serling

April 26, 2011 1:27 PM
Last Edited 1253 days ago

I will no longer watch F1 if it is on pay-per-view television. I will not sponsor the senseless reduction in audience for such a short term gain.

Reduce the audience & you reduce the significance of the sport, such as pay-per-view has done for boxing & darts etc. In my opinion pay-per-view, with the advent of the internet has had it's day.

RawDawg

April 26, 2011 1:27 PM

pay per view?

I wouldn't pay to watch F1 or any other motorsport or race. Ridiculous.

And why would the current sponsors pay what they are paying now if less people world wide will see the logos? How will the team justify their sponsorship packages with less eye balls in the TV audience?

philbell800@msn.com - Unregistered

April 26, 2011 1:38 PM

I suspect sky thinks it would bring in a lot more subscribers but in reality most people won't pay for something that is only on a couple of hours a month. I certainly wouldn't subscribe, at best I'd watch a few european races in the pub, other than that I wouldn't bother and I haven't missed a race since '94.

Gixxer - Unregistered

April 26, 2011 2:01 PM


Pitty the BBC does not also drop Motogp coverage so it can be exclusive on Eurosport in the UK. instead of the second rate coverage it currently gets.



notsonewf1fan

April 26, 2011 2:20 PM
Last Edited 1253 days ago

I would quite happily pay the Beeb just a little bit extra just to keep F1 because they do such a brilliant job that it would be worth it,and if Murdoch gets his hands on it you can kiss goodbye to seeing all the practice sessions you will even be lucky to still see qualifying.This great sport will all but be finished if he buys it and that will be it for me.

Oldmosis

April 26, 2011 2:21 PM

Having read about this on another website, the Concorde Agreement clause says the sport should be "shown free to air where there are suitable broadcasters prepared to do this." Last year there were around 527 million viewers on free to view channels worldwide, and the sponsorship deals would surely drastically diminish if this were to change.

Yes the Concorde is up for renewal next year, but would need all the teams and the FIA to agree a change. Would they be willing to risk losing sponsorship if the viewing figures decreased as drastically as I believe they will if they went pay-per-view??

sinistre - Unregistered

April 26, 2011 2:26 PM

I hope it does go to pay per view because then the BBC can transmit the new wall painting competitions, because watching paint dry is a thousand times more interesting than formula yawn

Page 1 of 3
1 2 3  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.