F1 » Team Lotus remains but both sides claim victory


Team Lotus and Group Lotus both claim victory in the Lotus naming row after High Court ruling revealed

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

did - Unregistered

May 27, 2011 3:33 PM

the name sounds good - Team Lotus but I'm sure Malaysia F1 Racing using Renault engines would be better (while there is another Reanult Lotus team) and vice versa Lotus Renault for me is sort of mutant name neither it sound Lotus nor Renault and for me it's just Renault...still. Lotus and Renault brand in general have missed somehing even appearing on four F1 cars. Renault only gains from Red Bull results.

Ging - Unregistered

May 27, 2011 3:47 PM

You've gone on about heritage many times in the past Richard and yes the only true Team Lotus would be the one that continued from 1994. It also shows the murkiness of the case (licence agreements).

However heritage in today's world is not what it was. How many F1 teams today have had different incarnations over the years. I would argue the only true heritage in f1 is Williams and Ferrari.

Dice - Unregistered

May 27, 2011 3:57 PM

I care a great deal about the heritage of F1.

If I had an airline & a few billion lying around, I'd buy the Tyrrell name (most likely from Mercedes GP now) & reintroduce it into F1 to honour uncle Ken's efforts, & because it would just be great to see a Tyrrell GP car running around the track again.

No doubt you'd be on here giving us a thousand reasons why it wouldn't be the real Tyrrell team though.

Phill46

May 27, 2011 4:07 PM

I have just read the press release and still cannot work out who has won. Lotus Group is claiming victory but team Lotus can still race under the Lotus name WTF? It just ruins the reputation of the real Lotus under Chapman. Not good

Page 1 of 3
1 2 3  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.