F1 » Ecclestone: Hamilton just what Mercedes needed


Bernie Ecclestone: Lewis' name a stamp of good housekeeping for Mercedes

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

Jayne

October 27, 2012 9:06 AM

Morning Taipan and all.
To me the facts are there to see. Lulu touted himself to Red Bull and Ferrari and they did not want the hassle and the hype. Maclaren probably would have held onto him with Ron still loving Lulu but when you do the dirty on a team that has nurtured you for twenty years all that is left is the next "big" team.
Would loved to have been a fly on the wall when Red Bull and Ferrai said no!!!!

LewisMerc - Unregistered

October 27, 2012 9:30 AM

Richard,

Yes they were new parts, but you are making it sound as if Lewis hasnt got a clue whether the car has a new part or not.

Jayne, Mclaren didnt bring Lewis to this would, you cannot flog a dead horse, why continue when you are no happy, You by the sword you die by the sword, if am correct Mclaren are poaching a Ferrari apprentice. So Ferrari saying no made your day ah? wow!

richard

October 27, 2012 11:15 AM

jayne. the funny thing is that lulu was touting himself to ferrari and rbr in MAY, yet brawn claims that he approached merc in DECEMBER last. it that was true, then merc might have not shown interest initially, and ferrari and rbr were second and third choices. as i said before, there appears to be some other factor influencing the situation.

lulumerc. mclaren approached ferrari about giving perez the seat. and ferrari gave permission.

107SS2009

October 27, 2012 5:46 PM

Rob, I did not say that Lulu is not FERRARI material, I was quoting FERRARI saying so, and in my opinion that makes a lot of sense.
It is useless and a waste of time for you to keep hoping that Alonso or any other driver for that matter will have classic brain farts a la Lulu.

Page 5 of 5
« 1 2 3 4 5 

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.