F1 » Lotus unlikely to race double DRS


Lotus unlikely to race double DRS according to James Allison

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

richard

October 31, 2012 9:08 AM

sodesu. at least they are trying innovations! and also, their attempts (initially with reasonable results) prompted others to speed up a development in those areas. dont forget, the drd of lotus prompted rbr to go along a similar route, but with more success. nobody copied mercs attempt.

Objective

October 31, 2012 9:46 AM

@Richard

The problem for them is that by prompting others to speed up development it has left them further behind. Next year they won't be able to use it so they may as well stop development.

richard

October 31, 2012 10:48 AM

objective. as blzbub says, the merc original system, that fed the front wing, is outlawed next year, but the merc/lotus/rbr rear wing system is CURRENTLY not banned for 2013. however both lotus and now merc are querying its effectiveness, with merc saying that they are unlikely to use the passive system even next year. only rbr have perfected a system, which is NOT a passive system, (but it could fall foul of the ban for next year, as the rule will state that the drs can only be used for ONE purpose, and that is the mechanical movement of the flap.)
in effect, there are currently THREE systems in use.
1 merc bleed hole to front wing
2 merc and lotus passive system...speed sensitive
3 rbr bleed hole acting on rear beam wing.
it would not surprise me to see the fia banning even the passive system for next year.

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.