F1 » Red Bull success justifies Renault call


Renault was right to stay in F1 as an engine supplier according to president Carlos Ghosn after Red Bull's latest title success

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

MRG - Unregistered

November 20, 2012 3:28 PM

I think the Red Bull wins are due to Red Bull teamwork, & more specifically Adrian Newey & Sebastian Vettel. The engines have never been the most powerful & the alternator has let both drivers down! Renault have some homework to do over the winter break!

mrfill

November 20, 2012 4:37 PM

Renault alternators by Magneti Marelli

As used in Lotus and Caterham cars as well, but they have not had nowhere near as many problems. On that basis it is likely that RBRs problems are related to its location and the surrounding bodywork which prevent it being cooled correctly. In other words, it is Newey's design which is causing the problems.

MRG - Unregistered

November 20, 2012 5:43 PM

Fair comment mrfill re the Renault alternators manufactured by Magneti Marelli.

Re the cooling of the alternators, it could be argued a number of ways - the bodywork design does not leave enough room for cooling, or the alternators design does not fit in with the requirements of the bodywork, or the engine design places the alternator in a compromised position in relation to the bodywork. Either way Renault, Magneti Marelli and Red Bull will all have homework to do!

107SS2009

November 20, 2012 6:42 PM

The failed Renault alternator is a Renault part it is not linked with the Italian supplier Magneti Marelli.
Overheating is the problem, we use various suppliers for the sub internals but we build the alternator so we are responsible for the integrity of the part (Rob White).
The alternator is shaft driven off the crankshaft sitting in between the water pump and the hydraulic pump, it weighs 750g, is 5cm in diameter by 7cm long, maximum running temperatures are 200 degrees C for the copper windings and 150 degrees C for the bearings.
Two of the four engine manufacturers use water cooling to cool the alternator, Renault uses air cooling.

Ptolomy - Unregistered

November 20, 2012 7:08 PM

Everyone should remember that Renault invented EVERYTHING associated with the modern F1 Engine, beginning with their introduction of turbocharging in 1977 at their inception into the sport.

107SS2009

November 20, 2012 7:26 PM

Renault sports certainly contributed a lot with many firsts in F1 engine technology (engine making) but to say that Renaul invented everything associated with the modern F1 engine is stretching things too far and exposing a gross lack of technical knowlelge.

richard

November 20, 2012 7:37 PM

sunny. yeah. the current f1 engine probably owes more to cosworth than to renault.

re the alternators. again you are correct. the innards are provided by mm, but the casings etc are all pure renault. i did see somewhere that the precise problem area was in a bearing. not sure if that is correct or not, but overheating of a bearing could be causing the failure?

your post just popped up. do really believe that those who disagree would dare try to discuss a technical subject?

spaghettieddie

November 20, 2012 7:59 PM
Last Edited 737 days ago

@Sunny "Overheating is the problem, we use various suppliers for the sub internals but we build the alternator so we are responsible for the integrity of the part (Rob White)."

We??????? So....you work for Renault Sunny? And while I am at it...could liquid nitrogen be used in some way to cool the alternator? Just a thought. Ed


Ok got it...You did not use quotes but did credit Rob White...my bad! :o

Page 1 of 3
1 2 3  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.