F1 » Lotus to feel the ‘burn’ as Coca-Cola enters F1


The Coca-Cola Company is to finally enter F1, but not with its iconic title brand and not with McLaren.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest
Filter Comments: All | Registered

Abhishek - Unregistered

November 22, 2012 3:23 PM

4-5 years down the line - F1:

1. Redbull Racing Renault
2. Pepsi Gatorade Mclaren Honda (erstwhile Mclaren Mercedes)
3. Coca Cola Burn Lotus Renault (erstwhile Lotus Renault)
4. Schweppes Ferrari (erswhile Ferrari)
5. Monster Mercedes (erstwhile Mercedes)
6. Full Throttle Sauber Ferrari (erstwhile Sauber)
7. McDowell Sahara Force India Mercedes (erstwhile Force India)


and F1 would be named as Formulw- "Bernie sold F1 to Drink Companies"- One

Josh - Unregistered

November 22, 2012 3:51 PM

Burn has been around for a long, long time. In Australia it was one of the first energy drinks to surface, long before Red Bull, Monster and V became so popular. It lasted about six months before disappearing from shelves amid unanimous agreement that it tasted like crap.

I was overseas in China, Mongolia, Russia and Finland not long ago and was quite surprised to see it on sale in those areas. I'd completely forgotten about it.

jk750

November 22, 2012 5:53 PM
Last Edited 207 days ago

@Josh
I have never seen Burn or V energy drinks in Finland. Only RB, Monster, Rockstar and some domestic energy drinks.

Green Monster

November 22, 2012 7:18 PM

Burn is quite popular in the Spanish motorcycle championship, they also sponsored the first female Moto2 rider this year - Elena Rosell.

And too all those of you saying you've not heard of it before now, then their campaign to advertise their energy drink is already working :)

Page 2 of 4
« 1 2 3 4  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.