F1 » Vettel ‘never wasted thought’ on Brazil controversy


Sebastian Vettel claims that he was unmoved by the suggestion he had made a mistake in the Brazilian GP that could have resulted in his third world title going elsewhere.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest
Filter Comments: All | Registered

richard

December 20, 2012 2:02 PM

rob. did i say that lulu was cheating? NO! but now that you mention it..... getting lifted back on to track, lying, multiple crashes which were his fault but no penalties applied, etc etc.
i was responding to a rather silly post that implied that vettel would not be penalised for an infraction but lulu would. in fact, history proves that it was the other way around!

richard

December 20, 2012 2:21 PM

just seen a statement by de montezemelo. he states that if ferdi decided to move, then seb is at the top of his list. and lulu would be lower down. but he is watching hulk, and even grosjean.

rob01

December 20, 2012 2:35 PM

I saw it as well Richard. He says because it would be lewis's third team. Which would in his mind make it lewis's second half of career . Funny he picked up telphonso on his fourth effort. You can't believe most of what red spews.

Honest - Unregistered

December 20, 2012 5:24 PM

Why would he, he has FIA in his back pocket come on vettel fans arrow this down as this site is clearly vettel live fest, lol even the team principle picked alonso as thier number 1 driver of the year how embarrassing that must have been winning Wdc but not being picked point system is ridiculous the best driver didn't win again.

rob01

December 21, 2012 2:21 AM

5 agree. 1 disagrees.
bazzle. odd comment, bearing in mind that lulu has gotten away with many many indiscretions. (that is one record that lulu retains and is unlikely to be broken). seb did not get away with anything. he abided by the rule!
Posted by richard (15 hours ago)

How does Lewis Getaway with all the indiscretions? You act as if he owned a crane or had the stewards in his pocket. Yet everything Vettel does and gets away with is according to the letter of the law. Two faced say. Fanboys

Angelina - Unregistered

December 21, 2012 2:55 AM

I strongly believe that like real life, there r diff rules for stars. Stars r sometimes not penalized for the mistakes where others are. Vettel & Hamilton fans & anti-fans argue who is star and who is not. FIA goes by the wdc standings (and consider both as stars).

richard

December 21, 2012 7:51 AM

bazzle. no. thats democracy! the reason that i have agrees, is that others agree wih me! i cannot agree with myself, as the site doesnt allow me, but i think that some posters have ascertained a way to agree with their own comments.

carinni - Unregistered

December 23, 2012 9:01 AM

i think senna has entered vettel's rwar line for very long time. according to the rule, vettel should leave enough place for senns to go. but the stewards never has consistency in this issue, vettel was penalized in mozza, however senna was not penalised in signapore even blocking massa, now vettel was also not penalised. seems that we can't explain this rule by our eye sight, just don't understand how to understand this rule

carinni - Unregistered

December 23, 2012 9:08 AM

richard, i think the rule has stated clearly( further clarified the first quarter) once the tracing car's front has entered your rear wheel line, u have to leave enough space, even u are still ahead. Thats y vettel was penalized by forcing alonso out to turf st monza. So now evrn Vettel was always ahead of Senna, but Senna has entered into his rear wheel line for a very long periof of time, so the agrument point is not whether Vettel is ahead of hime or not. it was for sure Vettel was ahead, but he still had to leave space for Senns i think.

Page 3 of 3
« 1 2 3 

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.