F1 » F1 Driver of the Year vote: 7th


You voted Mark Webber into 7th place in Crash.net's F1 Driver of the Year poll!

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest
Filter Comments: All | Registered

MrQwerty

December 25, 2012 9:14 PM

This seems about right, it's easy to forget how close to Vettel he was in the first half of the season. Webber would have a better chance of winning the title if the Red Bull wasn't quite so good if you see what I mean.

Luke - Unregistered

December 25, 2012 9:19 PM

By the time he got a good car he was in the wrong side of his career, and to make matters worse he has had a massive metal rod in his leg the entire time, if he was in a title contender car back in 2003-2008 he could of matched vettel.

Dan Unda - Unregistered

December 25, 2012 10:08 PM

Webber is SUPPOSEDLY driving an identical car to the WDC - is he or aint he??
Why are his starts so rubbish thgus preventing any decent opposition to Vettel?- is it him (poor driving) or is the launch control on his car being set different to Vettel's ( in which case he should make it public knowledge)
Is he too scared to upset the cosy little crevice he is in ( in which case embarassing- have some pride, dude)
Cant have it ALL ways ,fellas
He has a history of driving mistakes ( ie not a top notch driver)
Red bull are quite happy to have him because his regular underachieving falsely validates Vettel's driving
I wanna see a true FIGHT taken to Vettel by a good driver in a compatible car as Vettel has and this aint neva gunna happen with this journeyman driver in the other red Bull
Cant see the logic of supporting a driver just because of the flag hr carries- jingoistic narcissism is all that is

f1fan - Unregistered

December 25, 2012 11:58 PM

Can anyone imagine how many more races and even shots at title he may have have if he could get a f1 car off the start line?? Half the poles he secured he threw away by the first corner.beside that he's great

107SS2009

December 26, 2012 10:09 AM

This poll was about F1 driver of the year, or was it? The best and most reliable vote for the F1 driver of the year must surely be the vote by the pit lane team principals because they just vote for the best and stop there and not go along placing drivers in preferred order, on votes like these (F1 sites) there will always be disagreements by both those that voted as well as those that didn't, and let's face it, there is always going to be some biasness in the voting. Apart from the prestige of being voted the best by the teams principals the thing a driver desire the most is to beat whoever races with the same car as his, because that's where one shows who is the best/better driver, if one is behind a different car/beaten by a different car then the situation is not as negative.

rob01

December 26, 2012 12:50 PM

Also remember that people like to find Polls that give them what they are looking to see. Then they claim that is the best poll possible. So if you don't find what you are looking for in this poll you may always choose/find one you do like.

Irving Drut - Unregistered

December 26, 2012 2:11 PM

rob01, Crash has that many polls going at the moment just to keep people coming back to see what most of the pommy wa*kers have voted for. Crash should spend more time getting the news that people want to read not meaningless polls that aren't worth a knob of goatsh*t. I haven't been able to find the top 10 of those that managed to pull the end off it while trying to change hands at 100.

Page 2 of 3
« 1 2 3  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please do not post any personal abuse or attacks.

  • (this will never be displayed, but is required for email notification of follow-up comments)

    Email me when this topic is updated.

Note: Your comment may take a few minutes to appear

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.