Vettel floats to the top as Albert Park dries out | Oldest Comments | Page 1 | F1

F1 » Vettel floats to the top as Albert Park dries out

After an overnight delay because of heavy rain, the final two sessions of qualifying saw Red Bull lock up the front row of the grid for the 2013 Australian GP.

Filter Comments: All | Registered

WeGotFingered - Unregistered

March 17, 2013 2:42 AM

Vettel was well in control of his appendages as he fingered his way to the front.

Fernandabulous

March 17, 2013 2:44 AM

both Red Bulls were fastest through all three sectors, and they're not even the slowest through the speed traps (6th and 8th)

cassyo

March 17, 2013 4:40 AM

Which part of the track will be Massa this time on ?

Vettel had another fastest lap going by about a four tenths of a second, which he aborted to save his tires when it became obvious to the team that he wasn't going to be challenged for the pole. He's going to be hard to beat assuming the track stays dry for the race.

John - Unregistered

March 17, 2013 4:59 AM

Vettel taking pole will never come as a shock, but the size of the gap - seven tenths ahead of the first car that's not a Red Bull - is surprising. Let's wait and see what the race pace looks like though.

cassyo

March 17, 2013 5:13 AM

While Rosberg has made no secret about his intentions to close the gap to the front, the Ferrari pair has kept silence instead, so it seems to be a very promising start.

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please do not post any personal abuse or attacks.

Your Name*
Your Email*

(this will never be displayed, but is required for email notification of follow-up comments)

Email me when this topic is updated.
Your Message*

Note: Your comment may take a few minutes to appear

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.