F1 » Raikkonen: Lotus must keep trying

Kimi Raikkonen: Of course, we wanted to win but today we didn't have the speed. [Overall] it was a good day for the team though - we are getting back to where we should be

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest


July 08, 2013 12:19 AM

Everyone is fooled when Vettel paces the last 10 laps to conserve tires and/or fuel when being pursued seriously. Kimi was facing the usual issue. Everyone else that tried to run 35-36 laps on mediums lost 2s per lap on the last 7-8 laps of the race. That would have put Kimi further back than he finished with 17 lap (11 race on 6 lap old) softs. This was not a race that was going to be won on strategy alone.


July 08, 2013 1:51 AM

Meh...I'd personally liked to have seen them try to run till the end of the race. Yes other cars had some big degradation towards the end so maybe he wouldn't have made it but think about it this way: the worst he could have done realistically if he failed to make it to the end and pit say 4 laps before the end was 4th or MAYBE 5th. Then Lotus would have been 2nd with Grosjean and 4/5th in the worst case scenario with Kimi, but they would have also have had a real shot at victory and to take points from Vettel.

I think they should take every chance to take points from Seb cause he's running away with this championship as is and Newey will only make that car better as the season goes on. Instead they made a conservative call...:(

The Lotus pace today bodes well for them in these summer races yet to come though, seems like high temp ensures they're right at the front.


July 08, 2013 1:58 AM

Also, for a few minutes there I thought Lotus had a stroke of genius pitting Grosjean which put RBR on the spot and I thought RBR made the same mistake Ferrari did in 2010 with FA in Abu Dhabi when RBR themselves pitted Webber and Ferrari immediately covered Webber by stopping FA which sadly for them dropped FA back behind the Renaults and gave Seb the championship.

But then Kimi pitted...Can't help but feel Lotus should have won today one way or another, but I guess you have to give credit to Seb in this case because they didn't.

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.