F1 » Wolff: We’ve exceeded expectations


Mercedes boss Toto Wolff says the team has exceeded expectations with its results so far in the 2013 F1 season

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

richard

August 22, 2013 7:58 PM

frozen candle. the question was if the dd was illegal or cheating. in my opinion, once the main teams had been told that their designs for such devices, then it was of course cheating. it was only for the fact that fia did not publicly disallow the system that other teams sprung it at the first race, where they could legitimately claim that it had not been banned. the fia were too weak to take action as two teams were pulling out, and they were concerned about the possibility of a break away series. they didn't twig on to the fact that it provided such a boost, that a backmarker team could suddenly be a race winner. the fact was that the three main teams had letters from fia stating that the dd was illegal

FrozenCandle

August 22, 2013 8:31 PM

"the question was if the dd was illegal or cheating"

Pretty much what I explained, Richard. If the section of permitted extra bodywork was considered a separate entity, it would be a legal design. If it was considered a part of the diffuser, it would be an illegal design. The FIA's poorly written and vague regulations allowed that exploitation, and allowed the three teams to turn up with questionable, but legal extension of their diffusers.

I do see the point you're raising, but personally I believe the FIA would have no right to deem a design illegal when they'd left the door wide open for exploitation to begin with. Nor do I believe that Brawn, Toyota and Williams would turn up with a blatantly illegal design, knowing that the FIA wouldn't punish it.

It's similar to the engine-mapping/blown-diffuser debate, where again teams used some pretty creative interpretations of the regulations to develop a system that would otherwise not be permissible. Incidentally, it was also the FIA's

FrozenCandle

August 22, 2013 8:33 PM

*the end got cut off :-)*

Cont...

Incidentally, it was also the FIA's poorly written and contradictory regulations that left enough shadow of doubt for Mercedes to believe they could test a 2013 car with Pirelli. Teams are always going to push the limits of what's acceptable so long as the FIA keeps leaving doors open. Whether it's moral or in the spirit of fair competition is another story...

richard

August 22, 2013 9:03 PM
Last Edited 322 days ago

frozen candle. not disputing either, but yes, the fia is the main culprit. like when rbr got a letter from fia about their hole in the floor, but when others complained, they acted promptly and banned it from that date on. and then their rules stating that the exhausts had to be above the pods and could not be used for aerodynamic effect....and what happened? the coanda appeared and again the fia did nothing this inconsistency and ambiguity is really ruining the sport. it will be interesting to see what grey areas are exploited next year. I am f the opinion that the exhaust will again feature strongly!.

Page 2 of 2
« 1 2 

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.