F1 » David Tremayne: Vettel dominates at Spa


Three time Guild of Motoring Writers Journalist of the Year Award winner David Tremayne casts his eye back over the Belgian Grand Prix and a win for Sebastian Vettel…

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

cassyo

August 28, 2013 2:35 PM

"...and simply drove past Hamilton's Mercedes as if somebody had chained it to the fence. "
Nail kicked right on the head by DT.
Well, TBH, it is not the first time when such a fence acts in Seb's favour (2011, passing Alonso anyone ?) but, since then, I think it is maybe the first time when ''the fence'' reappears so obvious.

palindrome1H

August 29, 2013 1:16 AM

Well he obviously hates Maldonado. Not that I like him or anything. He was cut off by Sutil and that caused his car to go straight into Di Resta after contact. And I've never defended bone headed Maldonado.

tomcol

August 29, 2013 11:24 AM

Have to disagree
Vettel went past Hamilton in his less powerful Renault engined car because he nailed it and then pulled out a gap to annul the chance of drs being used. Racecraft, pure and simple and the reason Vettl has won the last 3 championships and haeding for his fourth.

bobsmyname

August 29, 2013 12:15 PM

I agree with tomcol.

I don't think the RedBull was faster in a straight line at all. Vettel just got a MUCH better run through Au Rouge than Hamilton did. You can see it quite clearly on the replays - he nailed Au Rouge and Hamilton didn't.

pcxmac

August 31, 2013 6:51 AM

I love listening to people try to convince themselves RBR dont have a fast car in the straight line :) Who was at the top of the traps that weekend. Lolz. Give me a freaking break. Ignorance is Strength :)

richard

August 31, 2013 8:51 AM
Last Edited 313 days ago

pcxmerc. spa was the FIRST time that rbr have had a car geared for top speed. they took nearly all aero off the car, whereas others just adjusted their aero. they tried two methods in fp, one with virtually no rear wing, the other with more pressure on front and rear wing. both drivers stated they could handle the reduced grip, so they went with the tiny rear, and it worked! they then geared the car to take advantage of the lower drag on the long straights.

ps. they may of course also have added a turbo to the exhaust. the increased efficiency meant that they did not have tocarry as much fuel. it all helps!

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.