F1 » Tost: We would have liked to keep Ricciardo


Toro Rosso boss Franz Tost admits to disappointment at losing Daniel Ricciardo, and insists that there is no rush to appoint a successor to the Australian.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest
Filter Comments: All | Registered

AlexKulibin

September 03, 2013 4:55 PM

This is all very interesting but tell me this. Is the Ricciardo/Vergne pairing that better than Buemi/Algersuari? The results of both pairings look almost identical, yet all we see is praise about how great Ricciardo is. If anything, Toro Rosso doesn't even do what it's supposed to (that is granting the drivers a proper stepping stone to Red Bull based on a weighted evaluation of a driver's performance, not on Mateschitz's turbulence of emotions.)

AlexKulibin

September 04, 2013 6:57 PM

Bob Jane, well, 6th place in Canada was a one-off thing, and the previous best result (in the 2009-2012 years) was 7th place, just one lower, which is not a big deal.

Last year the team came ninth in the Constructor's championship, exactly the same as in 2010, with an average of 11th finishing spot.

This year something happened to their main competition, no wonder the team is running in 7th place. Sauber and Williams are not a challenge any more, hence the slightly better results.

All I'm saying is that Toro Rosso is a flawed concept. They should've given a fair chance for Buemi/Algersuari to enter a top team, instead they fired them like garbage and hired a new pairing, which is on the same level of skill. I have nothing against Vergne or Ricciardo, but seeing how Daniel was signed up mid-season for questionable feats makes me think that it was a done deal long ago.

Plus there's no knowing if Ricciardo will beat his teammate. The two are going toe to toe.

bob jane

September 05, 2013 9:22 AM

Alex you and l don't own a team or understand all the inner workings of one , the team had their reasons for dumping the other pair....if they thought they were champs they would of keep them.......tost did say the torro was a better balanced car in 2012 and the 2013 tires have had them scratching their heads this year. ...Maybe they expected better results in 2012?..on the surface it seems unfair BUT?

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.