Kimi: Six points are better than nothing
Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

4 agree.
Report Abuse
Its the same, they took MS beacsue he was regarded as the best of the bunch of F1 drivers... same reason tehy took on Kimi.... so until theres a better option things will remain the same...
Posted by KR - Unregistered (562 days ago)
Recommended Comment
Sort Comments: Oldest   |   Newest

F1 » Kimi: Six points are better than nothing

World championship pace-setter left thanking his lucky stars after opening lap contact fails to derail his challenge in Istanbul.

Add Comment

Have Your Say Comments
2 agree. 4 disagree.
Report Abuse
Kimi is my favorite driver.
Even have a child named after him...
But it always surprises me how when thing don''t go right, he seem to be unable to catch up.
And what is more annoying still, is that when he got one of those bad week-end, Massa always seem to enjoy a (well somewhat) easy ride.
At any rate Kimi is still a much better driver than Massa, and will always emerge victorious in the long run, but those momentary "unsolvable problem" seem strange to me. Not that they happen, difficulties do arise now and then for everybody, but the fact that he never seem to be able to find a way to rule them out, just find the way to limitate the damage...
Posted by Dany Brown (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
4 agree.
Report Abuse
Kimi drove like a true world champion, as long as the car makes it to the finish line, he'll score points in every race! Can't wait to see you in Montreal!!!!
Posted by EliasK - Unregistered (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 6 disagree.
Report Abuse
He won lat year thanks to RD s sgfavours and is underperforming this year. He owes Ferrari more than Ferrari owes him. If things go on like this, he may be the one that loses his job ccome 09.
Posted by chu chu (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
3 agree.
Report Abuse
Chu

Your obsession with bringing up last year's FA / McL thing is dull in the extreme.

Kimi had a storming second half of the championship last year and won the most races -he's a worthy champion. Even if he does have 'off' weekends occasionally.
Posted by Simon (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 3 disagree.
Report Abuse
who named FA? Mc Laren f d up and that was key to Raikkonen s chship. That s a fact, and for Ferrari standards, Kimi didnt exactly set the world on fire. This year he s not dominating his teammate , who we all agree isnt exactly the most consistent driver.
Posted by chu chu (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
chu, "who named FA---" well you did indirectly, by blaming RDs favouritism (for Lulu). had this not existed, then FA would probably have won the championship! kimi can be a little lacklustre at times. he may hve been hampered by wing damage yesterday. dont forget how critical aero is . FM may not be the most consistent, but he is fast. on an OVERALL average basis, i would consider kimi and felipe to be about equal
Posted by rich ard (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse


No Kimi is on average quicker than Massa, especially on race pace.

The current pecking order of top5 is probably like this:

kimi > Alonso > Sham > Kubica > Massa
Posted by Tealeaf :D (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree.
Report Abuse
Kimi had a damaged front aero but he was still catching LH right a then end of the race so he wasnt that off the pace as LH was rather quick... but I would have guessed had he got on the the tail of LH he would have even more problems in turbunelt airs.

To those who still like to dig the past up had Kimi not been there who would have won the WDC??? Go a bit further back after moving from Benetton to Ferrari how many years MSC did not win the WDC with Ferrari and not lose his job???
Posted by KR - Unregistered (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
Different story, when MS went to Ferrari the team nor the car were top level like when Kimi signed for them.

I just expected Kimi to beat Massa consistently. Seriously, Massa was signed to Ferrari for one main reason, he s never done anything too remarkable outside ferrari

Posted by chu chu (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
4 agree.
Report Abuse
Its the same, they took MS beacsue he was regarded as the best of the bunch of F1 drivers... same reason tehy took on Kimi.... so until theres a better option things will remain the same...
Posted by KR - Unregistered (562 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 1 of 2
1 2  »
Have Your Say Comments


Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us using the [Report Abuse] function next to the offending comment post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service will be edited or removed with immediate effect. Crash Media Group prohibits defamatory posts.
 
Site Map
© 1999 - 2009 Crash Media Group
The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.

Contact Crash.Net  |  Advertise on Crash.Net  |  Our Privacy Policy  |  About Crash.Net  |  Get News Feeds  |  Need a Website?

Find car reviews on sports cars such as Ferrari, BMW, Porsche and many more.