F1 » Hill attacks Raikkonen

To richardo "(wistful thinking i presume)" surely you mean (wishful thinking i presume)", and yes you did defend hill as in he changed his mind and he did so again so what's the problem. As for matt "claming that "£he knows it all", but again, he has his opinion and forums are for that, but not for ramming vitrion down everyones throats" why are you doing that you do so on many occasions and many threads on this site even if you think you are innocent of it. I think really you are just a pedantic old person who has nothing else to do but pick faults with anyone elses comments that disagree with your own.

Go, ric hard go, you are our hero!

Should I say something bad about Lewis here?

to the poster who calls himself Damon Hill (wistful thinking i presume), i dont recall actually defending hill, but i may have defended his right to change his mind, just as any one who posts also has the right to change their mind, given canging circumstances and facts. and i dont recall matt claiming that "£he knows it all", but again, he has his opinion and forums are for that, but not for ramming vitrion down everyones throats

Wont this guy ever shut up??. He only won the championship in a car that my grandmother could have driven and still won.The williams was unbeatable at that time. Even JV won the year after and he cant drive.
Anyway, as if Ferrarri would ever give DH a drive. The closest he will ever get to a Ferarri is by buying one.

damon is aworld champ, but on a lower level than the great ones. gilles never won a chship but i think we all agree he s better than his son and that damon

well matt for someone who makes out he is a wizard and knows everything about F1 and knows better than people who have been involved in the sport (Lauda/Hill) nearly all their life on these threads you sure are making a few apologies, and seems you regard richard in such high esteem then you must agree with his comment posted about hill on a previous thread when richard defended hill when he changed his mind on a story about who he thought would win WDC i.e. said somethinmg different on the next day.

There seems to be far to many expert know it alls on this site

Tho damon isnt making much sense i agree.

but as a driver, he was great and very underated, he was team mates to Prost, Senna Mansell and Villeneuve. thats 9 world champions! 10 including his own. He did the best in every car he had. yes 99 wasnt good but in fairness he tried to retire mid season but they wouldnt let him.

as for SPA, he told the team that we can either race and both not finish or have a 1-2. pretty much saying if we race he WONT(one way or another) win. which is exactly what senna, schumi or alonso would of done. except they would of just done it with out telling the team.

Damon did a good job, most of which he got no credit. and he was ok on a bike at brands

Good Driver, came good in the late stages of his career,but he is not qualified to attack a good driver like Raikonen, oh yeah could do with making up his mind

Kimi is in a lazy stage of his F1 career at present, no-one can deny that, but the guy has massive natural talent that can also not be denied.
You cannot blame him for his apparent lack of drive. He is tottally disillusioned by the F1 circus. He hates F1, but loves to drive.

This is cleary a case of crash.net trying to get more out of a story than its worth.
Saying "Hill Attacks Raikkonen" is a huge exaggeration of Hill simply making a subjective observation of a situation. Nothing more.
He wasn't “attacking” Raikonen at all, or “accusing” him of anything for that matter.

Please, don't offend your readers.
We are not idiots, and can see a story for what its worth.

If there is no real story don't twist things around, or make it sound worse than it is!
Just to prove my point. Here are a few examples as a headline to this story:
Raikkonen in a rut - Hill
Damon says: "Kimi not at his best"
Hill's view on Ferrari drivers

Hey, I'm no journo!