F1 » BMW, Renault push for turbo return in F1.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

Clint - Unregistered

August 29, 2008 5:32 PM

Why not allow advantages for those who produce more efficient engines with less emissions or running on sustainable resources?

If F1 can be pointed into a direction that will help normal road users then it would be a great idea.

Jim Eagan

August 29, 2008 5:44 PM

With the proper system of HP regulation and ballast, etc. Why not? Why not have a variety of engine types in F1?

Ferrari can have their V-12, Audi or Peugeot can enter a diesel (plus, with F1's trying to be 'green' it can run biodiesel), Toyota and Honda can have their hybrid systems (with or w/o turbochargers) in place .... the possibilities are endless. I think that would add an interesting element into the sport that hasn't been there in quite a while.

Sick Cylinder - Unregistered

August 29, 2008 7:40 PM

Turbos got a bit ridiculous last time round - different engine specs for practice and race, engines changed before every session - power was high, fuel consumption was terrible and costs were astronomical.

The problem with F1 is the lack of overtaking caused by very high downforce and very short braking distances - old fogeys like me remember that overtaking used to happen under braking. The rule changes won't go far enough - I would like to see a complete ban on front and rear wings, narrower tyres and a ban on carbon brakes - you would then be guaranteed overtaking, close racing and entertainment

Tim M - Unregistered

August 29, 2008 9:01 PM

Getting rid of all the 'appendages' is GOOD--they are horrible. I was surprised to see that those totally OTT front wings are still pretty well there---surely if the front wings were just a simple one piece wing (like on the high speed oval Indycars)then they would have a minimal effect and be less influenced by a car in front. The F1 teams would no doubt complain that the cars would be undriveable but it wouldn't take them long to sort it --that's what they do. Turbos should definitely have a place in F1 (but NOT diesels)

otta****** - Unregistered

August 29, 2008 11:09 PM

If cost wasn't an issue and you made the only engine rule "you have to get at least N miles/btu", where N can be adjusted to slow the cars down or speed them up, you would have a very interesting setup. You'd see many different engine types, and probably see some technology that could significantly raise MPG in the real world.

Zer0 - Unregistered

September 01, 2008 5:32 AM

I am in full support of the return of turbo to F1. However to cut cost whilst provide better spectacle and related to road user, I have some idea:

1. Rev-limit the engine to 15k revs
2. Ban pneumatic valves (valves must be mechanically actuated. not all manufacturers have access to pneumatics and i believe it is the main cause why engine cost in F1 skyrocketed)

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.