Hamilton blasts FIA Spa penalty 'wrong'
Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

78 agree. 16 disagree.
Report Abuse
I''m no Hamilton fan, but that penalty was just plain ridiculous!
Posted by Ste - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Recommended Comment
Sort Comments: Oldest   |   Newest

F1 » Hamilton blasts FIA Spa penalty 'wrong'

McLaren-Mercedes' F1 World Championship leader Lewis Hamilton insists the FIA decision to demote him from victory in this weekend's Belgian Grand Prix at Spa Francorchamps is 'absolutely wrong'.

Add Comment

Have Your Say Comments
78 agree. 16 disagree.
Report Abuse
I''m no Hamilton fan, but that penalty was just plain ridiculous!
Posted by Ste - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
32 agree. 61 disagree.
Report Abuse
Not debating who deserved to win the race, but honestly, anyone who believes Hamilton would have been ahead of kimi at La Source if the run off area was gravel rather than tarmac is kidding himself. Kimi had the racing line: instead of backing off and taking the corner BEHIND kimi, he chose to go straight and have better acceleration up to the hairpin.

Its a tough decision.. maybe heavy handed, especially in light of kimi crashing out, but SOMETHING has to be done about driver cutting chicanes because ''they cant fit''. Im sure if there was gravel there Lewis would have tucked in behind kimi just fine. The asphalt run offs are a joke.
Posted by John - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
57 agree. 7 disagree.
Report Abuse
No point in appealing mate.
The jury is already rigged against you.
Nothing will change until the manufacturers set up their own series, and give the FIM the boot.
Posted by Moot - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
14 agree. 21 disagree.
Report Abuse
''I was accelerating so that I didn''t lose too much ground, because I thought that would be unfair'' but cutting the corner is hardly fair

In doing so he cut the corner and accelerated too, lewis u didnt have to do that. cos u would of passed him anyway. it was harsh, but he did cut the corner for little or no reason. blaming kimi who didnt do anything wrong doesnt help his cause.

he has to learn to be more patient. it is harsh but its not the first time he has done it so now he might learn.

i do think lewis deserved the win, because massa certainly didnt. but the title race could now get good and a little fiesty too. cos so far up til today racing wise its been dull
Posted by brendan - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
53 agree. 12 disagree.
Report Abuse
The FIA penalty is totally ludicrous. It is now officially illegal to overtake a Ferrari during a Grand Prix.
If the McLaren appeal is not accepted then it will prove how biaised the FIA are towards Ferrari.
It sucks!
Posted by Tim M - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
21 agree. 7 disagree.
Report Abuse
John, you may well be right, but the run-off areas ISN'T gravel so the rules must be applied to the circuit that exists rather than what ifs.

The reason many tracks are using asphalt run-offs is because in many past incidents, gravel doesn't actually stop a fast car, because it will actually skim over the surface, before crashing heavily into whatever wall there is after the gravel. Asphalt is a much better surface for stopping an errant car. Look at the Paul Ricard circuit that is owned by BE, all run-off's are asphalt.

If the FIa have any backbone, they will overturn the stewards insane decision.
Posted by Calvin _ (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
14 agree. 8 disagree.
Report Abuse
the run off around the chicanes should be filled with gravel, otherwise its too easy for driver who gets squeezed (as hamilton did bt kimi) to say 'oh i couldnt make it, i accelerated up the run off so i wouldnt lose too much time'.

i remember hamilton being given a penalty in canada doing the same thing to sutil (where he didnt even give the position back). its not just about the position - accelerating out of the run off area gave hamilton the track position he needed to fight with kimi at the hairpin. had he had to negotiate the chicane normally, he would have lost time as he went way too deep off the racing line - the asphalt run off just gave him an easy escape route.
Posted by John - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
53 agree. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
Ferrari refuse to comment - that makes a bloody change as they comment on everything. It goes to show that they are prepared to accept the points weather it is fair or not.
I used to be a Ferrari fan last year, but I gave that up as a bad joke as they were the cheats not mclaren. This year we have no spy scandal just blatent cheating. Hamilton has a right to be aggrieved as this stinks of corruption. Ferrari are too embarised to comment and know that this will all get swept under the carpet like it usually does. The only way to hit the FIA is boycott the races.They dont give a **** what anybody thinks anymore, which is obvious by their actions.
Posted by cupid stunt - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
11 agree. 3 disagree.
Report Abuse
The run-off areas are safer than gravel in case something like that happens. I haven't seen the footage yet, but if Kimi was a sitting duck, then I don't think cutting the chicane was really an advantage. If he didn't do it there, he'd have done it slightly further up the road.

I genuinely believe Ferrari would not get the same treatment, but this is another example of F1 dragging itself through the mire. I wouldn't blame McLaren for boycotting, because everything they do seems to warrant some kind of frowning upon, especially when compared to a certain rival.
Posted by Boo - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
20 agree. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
Good on you Mr Hamilton, that bunch of sell effacingprats known as the FIA (Ferrari International Assistance) have done it yet again. If it is Ferrari they get away with anything, McClaren are penalised as a matter of course. I was amazed at that clown Blundell saying that they had acted correctly at Valancia I wonder what his comment will be now. It is time that the FIA was stocked by independants instead of Ferrari payees. If the insist on Ferrari winning at any cost then why bother having a race as only Ferrari can succeed.
Posted by Brian Hill - Unregistered (443 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 1 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »
Have Your Say Comments


Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us using the [Report Abuse] function next to the offending comment post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service will be edited or removed with immediate effect. Crash Media Group prohibits defamatory posts.
 
Site Map
© 1999 - 2009 Crash Media Group
The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.

Contact Crash.Net  |  Advertise on Crash.Net  |  Our Privacy Policy  |  About Crash.Net  |  Get News Feeds  |  Need a Website?

Find car reviews on sports cars such as Ferrari, BMW, Porsche and many more.