F1 »

Kate Walker: Cost cap

In her latest exclusive column for Crash.net, Kate Walker says a cost cap is the only option for teams hoping for a future in F1
Without a cost cap of some sort, Formula One will become unsustainable. The current division of the financial spoils has created a situation not unlike that which we see in the broader social landscape: a dearth of upward mobility, and a system heavily weighted in favour of those already in a privileged position.

But it doesn't have to be that way, and thankfully change is on the horizon. Unfortunately, some of the sport's most high profile figures have used their public platforms to denigrate either the concept of a cost cap or the minutiae of its application. This week's criticism has come via Red Bull, but the Milton Keynes team are hardly the first to have voiced an objection or two.

What is ironic about the recent comments challenging the current concept of the cost cap from Christian Horner and Dietrich Mateschitz is that – in the medium term at least – Red Bull will actually benefit from it.

Initially, the better-funded teams will have to go through a period of adjustment as they get used to a reduction in headcount and budget. But when the teams adapt – and they all will, quickly – Red Bull will see a sizeable chunk of its restricted operating budget covered by the bonus payment they agreed with the commercial rights holder last year, plus whatever they earn based on their championship standings the preceding year.

To put it into context, had a $200 million budget cap been introduced in time for the 2014 season, Red Bull would have earned around $160 million from bonus and winnings, leaving them with only $40 million to find through sponsorship. At the other end of the grid, where teams' operating budgets are a score or two below $100 million, the share of the prize fund is between $40-50 million, leaving those teams with a far greater share of their budget to make up through sponsorship.

So the budget cap is flawed. But that doesn't stop it from being a necessity.

As things stand, teams and the FIA are beholden to individual financial agreements with FOM that run through 2020. Until those agreements expire, Formula One will be as unequal as it's always been. But the simple introduction of a cost ceiling – and of a regulatory mechanism to ensure that said ceiling is adhered to – is the first step in what will be a long process.

To create a more level playing field, the cost cap will need to be gradually lowered until it is at a level that the backmarkers and mid-field can afford. If that can be achieved by 2020 – and there is no logical reason why it couldn't be, if the teams can adopt a utilitarian approach to the debate – then the next step is to negotiate deals with the CRH that bring prize fund pay-outs more in line with the sort of proportional distribution seen in England's Premier League.

The two-tier process would be painful for the current big spenders, and for those who currently benefit from preferential deals at the cost of their rivals, but for any team on the grid that hopes to still be racing in ten years' time, it's the only option.

Kate Walker

Kate Walker is a senior F1 writer for Crash.net. A member of the F1 travelling circus since 2010, she keeps an eye on the behind the scenes wheeling and dealing that makes Formula One a political melodrama.

Tagged as: FIA , Red Bull Racing

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
07.07.2013-  Race, Bernie Ecclestone (GBR), President and CEO of Formula One Management  and Christian Horner (GBR), Red Bull Racing, Sporting Director
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB12.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB12.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Jolyon Palmer (GBR) Renault Sport F1 Team RS16.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Kevin Magnussen (DEN) Renault Sport F1 Team RS16.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Kevin Magnussen (DEN) Renault Sport F1 Team RS16.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
Esteban Gutierrez (MEX) Haas F1 Team VF-16.
27.08.2016. Qualifying
27.08.2016 - Free Practice 3, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.08.2016 - Free Practice 3, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
27.08.2016 - Free Practice 3, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
27.08.2016 - Free Practice 3, Kevin Magnussen (DEN) Renault Sport F1 Team RS16
27.08.2016 - Free Practice 3, Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB12
27.08.2016 - Free Practice 3, Esteban Gutierrez (MEX) Haas F1 Team VF-16
27.08.2016 - Free Practice 3, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


February 14, 2014 1:42 PM
Last Edited 923 days ago

I've heard other guys on this page point out the obvious fact that companies like Mercedes or Ferrari would find it easy to hide their extra costs by using their 'non-F1' departments to work on aerodynamics etc It is impossible to police. I reckon Bernie should pay for a 'crack team' of f1 car developers... and only allow the lower 50% teams to benefit from the knowledge gained from the team - hell will freeze over before that happens though. Also allow extra tests for the lowest teams. What harm would come from the bottom 3 or 4 teams getting an extra chance to catch up? As for Bernie's $1m offer for whistleblowers. Mercedes spend $1m a day on R+D for their road cars. If they're motivating whistle blowers with money. The teams with enough money to overspend could easily pay off any whistle blowers if they wanted to

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.