F1 »

Q&A: Gary Anderson

They will and personally I think there is a good chance the grid will be more representative as far as the true performance of the car. That's because the warm-up of the tyre is better. Last year we had a lot of problems with people complaining about the warm-up and sometimes people slipped up and down the grid a bit because of that. So the grid should be more stable.

In the races however, it definitely looks like there will be big decisions to make on the pit wall as far as strategy is concerned. I keep saying strategy is a living thing. It is alright having a big plan. But recognise when that plan is going wrong. With so many people last year I was watching and it was so frustrating how they just stuck to their plans and then paid the price. [Kimi] Raikkonen lost a couple of races, I think, because the team dragged its feet in making a decision. There were decisions that could have been made that were better. Yes, you can end up with egg on your face. But it is very easy not to make a decision. But it can also be very rewarding if you do make a decision and it is right. That is why I say strategy is a living thing. You have got to be on the pit wall with your finger in the air and if it gets wet it is raining! Do something about it. You don't have to phone somebody else to find out it is raining.

This will be the third year with the Drag Reduction System [DRS]. Do you like it?

Gary Anderson:
I don't like it. I don't like anything that is artificial. We are tackling the ability to race in the wrong way. It is like going skiing knowing you are going to break your leg and putting a plaster on before you go. I genuinely believe the cars should have a lot less downforce and that is quite easy to achieve with a major regulation change and could have been done for 2014, when there are major changes.

We also need a lot more tyre. Basically you increase the cornering speed up to 180-200 km/h by having more tyre. You [also] decrease corning speed above that so it is safer and you don't need as much run-off areas and such. You increase the ability for people to overtake because the cars are not so aerodynamically influenced. You decrease the ability for the big teams to get away from the small teams because with the tyres everyone just buys them and puts them on the car. You simplify a lot of things. A front wing assembly at the moment, for example, is so complicated it costs a £100,000 to make one. That is stupid. By re-writing the rules you bring that back down to a practical figure. So you save money, you make it safer and you make the racing better. You give everybody the same opportunity with the tyres to go racing. I can't find a negative.

DRS is just a patch on top of a problem - sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. This year it will only really be used in the DRS zone. Does that matter as such? Not really because in qualifying you never really saw it. It was just part of the lap time. The lap time should be half a second, maybe three quarters of a second slower in Q because of no DRS. But that will disappear into the undergrowth somewhere and we will have one or two positions on the track when you can use it in the race. For me that is a bit artificial if you get within one second of somebody...

Maybe it should be if you are going to have that type of advantage, you can only use it 20 times a race or something. Then you can use it to your advantage – you can use it for lap time or anywhere you want. You could have the same in qualifying. You could use it say 10 times in each session and you could save it all up for the last run if you want to - and put all your eggs in one basket - or you could use it a bit on your first run and then a bit on the second. You make decisions then. For me that would be the right thing. You can catch somebody in the race because you could use it every bit on one lap. I wouldn't publicise how many times someone has used it either. I'd keep that a secret so you didn't know and then it keeps the drivers' and teams all guessing.

Is that the way forward then?

Gary Anderson:
If you are going to have an overtaking tool - and DRS is the thing we have at the minute - there is much better ways to use it than we are doing now. I am not a great believer in overtaking tools. I like pure racing. For me it should be a strategic thing on the car like running the engine map at full power for three or four laps to catch somebody. You use it strategically, not just in that zone. For me that would be the best way to utilise it. You could do lots of things. But at the end of the day it is there and so I am just saying: 'Let us focus on that and how do we make it better.'

Moving on, do you think the midfield pack will still be as tight?

Gary Anderson:
It will be. I haven't really seen that the midfield teams have stepped forward - and I count five teams as being at the front and that leaves six, with four in the midfield [and two at the back]. I don't think they have shown any signs of being an aggravation for the guys up front. They will be now and again obviously. That is a case of them doing the job right and the other guys doing it wrong. But I haven't seen anything that makes me think yet there is six big teams now. The fight at the front will be tight and the midfield will be tight. I think the fight between Caterham and Marussia will be tight this year too.

Which team from the midfield is likely to trouble the top five most?

Gary Anderson:
I'd have to say if I was picking a team, and it is not just necessarily a team, Nico Hulkenberg and Sauber would be my bet. Nico is a fantastic driver and if they have an equal car to some of the others, he will put it up there. He got his confidence up last year and it is still there. But as I say, it is not just the team. If he was in a Force India still, I would say the same. I am not sure the Sauber is quite good enough at the minute. It looks like it is lacking a bit of grip. It is moving a lot. It has an understeer. Time will tell if they can get rid of that. But that is the one I would keep an eye on.

Nico was sensational in Brazil at the end of 2012 wasn't he...?

Gary Anderson:
He was sensational in those tricky conditions but you have to give him the tools to do the job. The Force India and Nico were great there. It just shows he should have maybe have had an opportunity to go to a bigger team. But commercial reasons or whatever meant he is there [and with Sauber]. You have got to say Ferrari must be looking at him a little bit for the future to replace Felipe Massa. He is an ideal candidate. I think the future is bright for him.

Finally, looking at the two backmarkers, Caterham and Marussia, what do they need to do in 2013?

Gary Anderson:
by Rob Wilkins

Tagged as: BBC , Anderson , Gary Anderson

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Fernando Alonso (ESP) Ferrari F138. 03.03.2013.
Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren MP4-28. 03.03.2013.
Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W04
Gary Anderson interviews Bernie Ecclestone on the grid before the United States Grand Prix

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


March 11, 2013 7:07 AM

In my view Gary Anderson is head and shoulders way better than all the other commentators. I find his technical info fascinating. Interestingly he tips Alonso for WDC! - You heard it hear first!

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.