F1 »

Brawn GP joins Williams and Toyota in F1 diffuser row

The new Brawn GP BGP001 has joined Williams' FW31 and the Toyota TF109 on the list of Formula 1 cars with controversial diffusers in 2009, it has emerged – with little hope of resolving the dispute before the curtain-raising Australian Grand Prix in Melbourne at the end of the month.

Cologne-based publication Express has reported that the ex-Honda machine has taken Williams and Toyota's interpretation of the diffuser even further, to the extent that it 'does not conform to the regulations'. The Mercedes-powered challenger has stunned observers with its scintillating raw pace and consistency in testing at Barcelona and Jerez over the past two weeks, regularly lapping up to a second quicker than any of the opposition despite the team having looked for much of the winter like it was facing extinction.

According to the German newspaper, the BGP001 design effectively links the floor of the car with the diffuser in a curved manner, thereby significantly increasing rear downforce.

Rivals have accused the three teams in question of going over the maximum permitted ride height for the structure – but no official protest will be allowed until all of the cars arrive Down Under for the first grand prix of the season in just under two weeks' time, reveals Forumula1.net.

Renault F1 managing director Flavio Briatore has already suggested that 'it seems that there are two rules' and that some teams have unfairly exploited the ambiguity of the regulations to gain an advantage [see separate story – click here]. Ferrari team principal Stefano Domenicali has since added his voice to that concern, claiming that whilst some teams applied the 2009 rules 'to the letter', others elected to follow 'a different approach'.

“We think that we've applied the modified regulations,” the Italian explained, “together with the FIA – to the letter. It might be that others took a different approach. The FIA has to dissipate any doubt; let's hope they'll do it fast and clear.”

Whilst some teams are up in arms about the perceived discrepancy, the FIA has already declared Toyota and Williams' designs legal and not in contravention of the regulations, with president Max Mosley underlining: “The current FIA view is that Williams and Toyota have been clever and found a loophole in the rules. It's probably wrong, but they've exploited the wording of the rules in a clever way.

“Somebody may challenge it and then the stewards could take another view. The view of our technical people is that it's okay; we'll wait and see if someone challenges it.”

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Jenson Button (GBR) Brawn GP, Barcelona Test 9-12th, March 2009
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - Steering wheel  Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - Mattia Binotto (ITA) Chief Technical Officer, Scuderia Ferrari and Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
23.03.2017 - Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
23.03.2017 - Cyril Abiteboul (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Managing Director and Alain Prost (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Team Special Advisor
23.03.2017 - Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17 and Guenther Steiner (ITA) Haas F1 Team Prinicipal
23.03.2017 - Jolyon Palmer (GBR) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17
23.03.2017 - Cyril Abiteboul (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Managing Director
23.03.2017 - Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

Who Cares - Unregistered

March 16, 2009 5:37 PM

Cheating, cheating, cheating... I remember when the Lotus with secondary schocks allowing the body to get close to the ground under aero pressure, banned while undisputedly not illegal. I remember the Brabham-Alfa with the vaduum cleaner, banned while obviously against no rule, I remember the Brabham BMW of Nelson Piquet in 1983, not banned although using an illegal fuel... F1 is a long story of clever engineers and poorly drafted rules, and stewards with a vengeance, declaring cars legal or illegal on grounds that are not easily understandable... Better watch MotoGP, World Superbikes, World Supersports than this ridiculous show

rob - Unregistered

March 16, 2009 4:38 PM

Why not tell the teams now that the diffuser is illegal? Why let them hit the grid and then be penalized? Clear it up now so we do not have the stewards meddling with the results. For Ferrari and Regie to voice such strong complaints against the diffuser they should step forward now to save face.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.