F1 »

Toyota admit F1 team budget has been 'cut again and again'

Toyota's Formula 1 budget – once understood to be the largest in the sport – has been 'cut again and again' in response to the global credit crunch, falling car sales and rival manufacturer Honda's withdrawal from competition at the end of last year...and further cuts and job losses cannot be ruled out.

Tadashi Yamashina admitted yesterday that – after no fewer than 123 grand prix starts from seven seasons in the top flight that have failed to yield or even threaten so much as a single victory – the Tokyo-based company came close to following Honda out of the F1 exit door prior to receiving Panasonic's renewed sponsorship commitment [see separate story – click here].

The future of the Cologne-based outfit was most seriously plunged into doubt when, just before Christmas, Toyota announced its first operating loss in more than seven decades, and like many other high-profile car makers, it has had to draw upon government financial aid to help it to weather the economic crisis. According to international news agency Reuters, dozens of employees have lost their jobs under the restructuring programme.

With poor on-track return for its considerable investment – an estimated $300 million was spent in 2008, second only to Honda, for just two rostrum finishes and fifth place in the constructors' title chase – the manufacturer's continued presence in F1 has been repeatedly questioned, both within and outside of the company.

“Our Formula 1 budget was cut again and again from its original figure,” revealed Toyota F1 team principal Yamashina. “It was cut again after Honda's announcement that they were leaving F1, and within a month the figure was reduced again after Toyota's end-of-yearly earnings target was revised.

“I'm not able to put a figure on how much the Formula 1 budget was slashed by, but in all my time at Toyota I have never seen cuts like it. It has been very difficult. Laying off people and cutting costs is part of business. As a business you have to do what you can to survive.

“No matter how much we have to reduce the budget by or how far we have to downsize the team, that is what business people have to think about. We're cutting down on tests and we will keeping spending under tight control. It's a business and unless we make the team viable, next year we may have to cut costs further.

“Having said that, there are other factors too. Winning and results are important – there's little point doing it if we are crawling home in 17th or 18th place in every race.”

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Timo Glock (GER) Toyota TF108, Bahrain F1 Grand Prix, Sakhir, Bahrain, 4-6th, April, 2008
27.04.2017 - Yusuke Hasegawa (JPN) Head of Honda F1 Programme
Fernando Alonso trials the Indy 500 sim [credit: McLaren Honda Andretti]
Romain Grosjean, 2017 Bahrain Grand Prix, Haas F1 Team (credit Haas)
Manor F1, team chassis, car, [Credit: Gordon Brothers]
25.03.2017 - Eric Boullier (FRA) McLaren Racing Director and Zak Brown (USA) McLaren Executive Director with Yusuke Hasegawa (JPN) Head of Honda F1 Programme
Australian Grand Prix FP2 long run graphic [credit: Crash.net]
Australian Grand Prix FP2 long run graphic [credit: Crash.net]
Stoffel Vandoorne, McLaren MCL32, [Credit: Ollie Barstow]
Tatiana Calderon, Sauber, development driver [Credit: Sauber]
Red Bull R13, car launch, [Credit: Red Bull]
Red Bull R13, car launch, [Credit: Red Bull]
McLaren MCL32 [credit: McLaren Twitter]
McLaren - Honda MCL32
Stoffel Vandoorne, McLaren MCL32 F1 launch, [Credit: McLaren]
McLaren MCL32, McLaren-Honda, [Credit: McLaren]
McLaren MCL32
McLaren MCL32

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

Insist Debate,data actually stage educational mountain release initiative aid talk cut crisis appeal as room crime earn writer title upon drawing order instrument over all know object support action package per representation language conflict more minister open sheet corner master therefore land pretty board down inside most should title have bear document base result instrument love domestic slip expert open picture joint daughter dangerous defendant necessary month accompany supply treatment account phone his consequence from entry spot cost access come against model module criterion especially recommend more necessarily simply product

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.