F1 »

Alonso, Sutil criticise 'desperate' and 'confusing' new F1 rules

Formula 1 stars present and past have spoken out against the top flight's controversial, newly-unveiled sporting and technical regulations – suggesting that 'the need to constantly change the rules of this sport' is risking making things 'problematic not only for the authorities, but also for the spectators'.

The most significant changes to be implemented following Tuesday's meeting of the FIA's World Motor Sport Council (WMSC) in Paris are an optional £30 million budget cap for teams – to be introduced from the 2010 campaign onwards – and a new system of determining the destination of the world championship laurels, with the title henceforth to go to the driver with the greatest number of race victories at season's end, not necessarily the most points [see separate story – click here].

Alonso, however, has warned the sport's governing body that such changes – the latest in a long line over the past year – risk driving fans away, and he suggested the budget cap in particular should be 'reconsidered'.

“I don't understand the need to constantly change the rules of this sport,” the Spaniard wrote on his personal website. “I think that these types of decisions can only confuse the fans.

“Formula 1 has developed for more than 50 years thanks to the teams, the sponsors, the drivers and, above all, the fans throughout the world, and none of them have been able to put their points-of-view in front of the FIA.

“I'm concerned not so much about the decisions that will affect the season which is about to start but, above all, those that will affect the future of the competition in the coming years.”

Alonso's sentiments broadly mirror those expressed by the Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA) – which has accused the FIA of being 'unilateral' in making choices that have the potential to 'turn on its head the very essence of Formula 1' [see separate story – click here] – and were backed up by Adrian Sutil, whose Force India outfit and other such cash-strapped teams the budget cap was designed to help.

“I have the feeling that a lot of things constantly change,” the 26-year-old told German broadcaster RTL. “In the past years there have always been new things.

“It seems to me as if they're desperately trying to make Formula 1 always more interesting and more spectacular. Perhaps they should simply leave everything how it is so that the spectators can get used to everything.”

“Having two different sets of regulations in place at the same time will be problematic not only for the authorities, but also for the spectators,” agreed former grand prix ace-turned-expert commentator Christian Danner, when asked about the budget cap by German news agency SID.


Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Fernando Alonso (ESP) Renault R28 With Brake Light Reflected In Eye, Chinese F1 Grand Prix, Shanghai, 17th-19th October 2008
Valtteri Bottas, Nico Rosberg
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Motorsport in 30 Seconds, 11th January 2017
Ayrton Senna - McLaren. 1993 Donington Park
Nico Hulkenberg - Renault Sport F1
Renault Formula One Team, launch date, [Credit: Renault F1]
Force India reveals the launch date for its 2017 F1 challenge
Nigel Mansell - McLaren-Mercedes
Lewis Hamilton and Valtteri Bottas
M-Sport reveals its Ford Fiesta RS WRC challenger
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
French Grand Prix at Paul Ricard
Lando Norris, McLaren Autosport BRDC Awards [Credit: Martyn Pass PR]

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


keech - Unregistered

March 19, 2009 2:03 PM

The sad fact is that, although it is clear that teams, driver and fans dislike the new rules, it doesn't matter. The FIA, Max and Bernie won't listen, as they have their own agenda. They won't revert to the old system, as they would all look like t##ts by having to go back on the desision. This season, i'm sure will be good, all motor racing is. The thing that WILL spoil the season is the daft and ridiculous rules imposed. I think it is clear that if the rules stay as they are to be, the teams need to break away and start their own championship with sensible, straight forward rules, like all other motorsport formula have, and bring back good racing for drivers, teams and fans alike.

Robsy - Unregistered

March 19, 2009 1:20 PM

So, judging by the comments posted on Crash, the fans don't like the new rules. The teams don't like the new rules, and FOTA have said so quite harshly. Now it seems lke the Drivers don't like them either. So at least we know who they are designed to benefit - the Make-work Scheme members at the FIA and Mr changes his mind every five minutes Ecclestone. Max wanted to reduce costs - presumably he has missed the cost implications of having to fundamentally redesign everything every year to meet the rule changes.



© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.