F1 »

Cost capping enforced, set at £40m

The FIA has confirmed it will introduce cost-capping to Formula 1 from 2010, although the budget has been raised from the originally proposed £30million to £40million.

In a move prompted by the ongoing global financial crisis, the FIA revealed they considered further restrictions on technical rules, but favoured cost-capping in order to prevent a 'spending race' and allow 'unfettered technical competition to flourish'

Cost-capping will relate to almost everything in Formula 1, although it does not include marketing, with the FIA keen for teams to promote the sport through various activities away from the race circuit.

It will also encapsulate engine costs in an attempt to attract more engine manufacturers to the sport, although this will only be apparent for 2010. Furthermore, manufacturers are being allowed to honour existing supply arrangement, provided there is no element of subsidy that could have a cartel-like affect on the engine market.

In addition, young driver programmes will also be exempt in a bid to lure a younger generation to the sport.

Teams will be encouraged to sign up to the budget capping in order to receive technical freedoms, including movable front and rear wings and engines with an unlimited rev limit. The teams will also be allowed unlimited out-of-season track testing with no restrictions on the scale and speed of wind tunnel testing.

With this in mind, the FIA is confident all teams will sign up to the scheme and avoid the prospect of a 'two-tier championship system'

As well as cut down on costs, it also hoped the move will attract more teams to the sport and prevent others from following Honda in quitting. Currently down to ten teams and twenty cars, a maximum of three more teams could be poised to join the grid in 2010.

The full FIA transcript is as follows:

How did the FIA arrive at the £40m figure?

We arrived at the figure by analysing both revenues and costs in Formula One. We know what the FOM (Formula One Management) revenue is likely to be in the future, and we have some understanding of realistic sponsorship revenues during the recession. Taken together, it's possible to project total external revenues for all finishing positions in the Championship. At £40m we believe that 70 per cent of the grid can generate a profit. This transforms the business case for owning a Formula One team, for both manufacturers and private investors. The desired net result is to have a very healthy commercial environment for present and new owners.

We also had a good look at costs, and believe that £40m in combination with greater technical freedom will allow engineers to create Formula One cars even more interesting and exciting than today's cars.

Will the £40m cap for 2010 be changed for future years?


Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Start, Bahrain F1 Grand Prix, Sakhir, Bahrain, 24-26th, April, 2009
McLaren, 2011 launch, [Credit: Crash PA]
Crash.net 2017 Formula 1 Calendar
Williams, FW40, teaser shot [Credit: Williams Martini Racing]
Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher and the 1996 Ferrari F310
Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12 to be unveiled on Feb 26th
Nico Rosberg and Fernando Alonso - Mercedes, McLaren
Antonio Giovinazzi - Ferrari SF15-T
Manor`s 2017 F1 car model [Pic: Twitter]
Manor`s 2017 F1 car model [Pic: Twitter]
Milwaukee reveals 2017 WSBK Aprilia RSV4
Milwaukee reveals 2017 WSBK Aprilia RSV4
Chase Carey, Ross Brawn & Sean Bratches
Sebastian Vettel, Kyle Busch, Kurt Busch, ROC [Credit: ROC]
Juan Pablo Montoya celebrates after winning the 2017 Race of Champions title in Miami [Pic credit: ROC]
Race of Champions 2017, action [Pic credit: ROC]
Juan Pablo Monotya. Race of Champions 2017, action [Pic credit: ROC]

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


April 30, 2009 7:15 PM

In my opinion this is actually quite a good idea, however I think it will only work if it is compulsary. I mean what if one option turned out to be 100X better than the other leading to a split grid, only one half being able to win because of a huge advantage (either more money or more technical flexibility). I just don't like the idea of a two-tiered F1! :rolleyes: (Originally just) Hannah! :D :)

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.