F1 »

'Serious' Ferrari dismiss suggestions F1 quit threat a bluff

Ferrari is deadly 'serious' and not 'bluffing' in its threat to walk away from Formula 1 over the FIA's controversial and unpopular new budget cap, the son of the Scuderia's legendary founder has insisted – as paddock cynics suggest the menace is 'just posturing'.

Both former team owner Eddie Jordan and triple world champion Niki Lauda have rubbished the Maranello-based concern's assertion that it is ready to pull the plug on F1 [see separate story – click here] over what it contends would be a two-tier system of haves and have-nots by dint of a cap that is not only not compulsory, but also 'not enforceable' and not 'possible to control'.

There are also fears that the regulations will be necessarily biased towards those teams that choose to adhere to the cap – with greater 'technical freedoms' available to capped competitors over their unlimited-budget rivals – and that reducing expenditure to a maximum of £40 million is unworkable in such a short space of time for squads that currently spend as much as £150 to £200 million a year.

Renault, Toyota and Red Bull have similarly signalled their intention to quit should the rules not be changed, with energy drinks magnate Dietrich Mateschitz – owner of the latter – reckoning that only two or three of the present outfits will remain should the governing body not back down.

Enzo Ferrari's only surviving son Piero – who owns ten per cent of the famous Italian company, the top flight's longest-standing and most loyal entrant as the only one to have competed in every single season since the official inception of the world championship all the way back in 1950 – has compared the situation to that of the 1980s, when his father had threatened to leave F1 in favour of the Indianapolis 500.

“He wasn't bluffing,” he told British newspaper The Guardian. “He was serious – and so are we. Our first objection is to the budget cap, which we don't believe it's possible to control. The second is that it is wrong that a team accepting the budget cap has more freedom and different technical regulations.

“If we are on the starting line of a grand prix, we have to stay within the same regulations, the same technical specifications. It's like soccer – in Italy we have Internazionale (Inter Milan), who are winning and they spend huge amounts of money for the best players, but in Serie A you also have a team like Catania, who have no money. Do you say to Catania, 'you can play with twelve players' and to Inter, 'you must play with nine'? It wouldn't be fair.

“This is what the new Formula 1 rules are like, though. They're not acceptable at all. ¬Everybody on the grid has to start with the same rules, otherwise there's no ¬competition and it's somebody else ¬deciding who's going to win.”

The cap has been implemented in an effort to restrict what had become ever-escalating expenditure in the world's most glamorous and expensive sport, safeguard the future of existing teams in the wake of Honda's shock exit back in December and attract new entrants to make the graduation, with three available extra slots on the 2010 starting grid. FIA President Max Mosley has argued that without it F1 will not survive the current global credit crunch – but Ferrari is adamant that there are other, more viable ways to save money.

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
10.09.2006 Monza, Italy,  Piero Lardi Ferrari (ITA) Son of Enzo Ferrari and 10% owner of the Ferrari automotive company - Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 15, Italian Grand Prix, Sunday Race
23.03.2017 - Carlos Sainz Jr (ESP) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12 and Daniil Kvyat (RUS) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - detail Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - Mattia Binotto (ITA) Chief Technical Officer, Scuderia Ferrari and Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
23.03.2017 - Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
23.03.2017 - Cyril Abiteboul (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Managing Director and Alain Prost (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Team Special Advisor
23.03.2017 - Carlos Sainz Jr (ESP) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12
23.03.2017 - Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17 and Guenther Steiner (ITA) Haas F1 Team Prinicipal
23.03.2017 - Jolyon Palmer (GBR) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17
23.03.2017 - Cyril Abiteboul (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Managing Director
23.03.2017 - Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

kdizzle - Unregistered

May 15, 2009 6:52 PM

I haven't missed a race since '99 and as sad as it is to see f1 in this state of disrepute I think it is a time for the changing of the guard. Unfortunately it may take f1 collapsing for these "politicians" to let go of the reigns. This is a "racing" series and the constant manipulation of the rules is shameful. Fans dont want to continuosly see the effects of stewards and FIA changing the outcome of races. Look at the other top series, MotoGP and WSBK. how many times do hear of thier governing bodies interviening in the races. Very rarely. I feel like the these people (mosly & ecclestone) have done to much to manipulate the series and it has essentially ruined the racing.

Swissy .

May 15, 2009 6:34 PM
Last Edited 2868 days ago

Just to make it clear i cant stand ferrari , but , they get my support on this , i think Mr whippy and the small one will have to change there ways, they just cant change the rules on a whim. They change the rules every year which cost the teams millions to follow and then say its to save cash, yer right, here is one for you , keeps the bloody rules the same for a year or two, it might save a hell of a lot more in the long run

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.