F1 »

Undeterred Ferrari insist FIA 'broke' Concorde Agreement

Undeterred by its defeat in a French court earlier this week that saw it fail to gain an injunction against the FIA's controversial £40 million budget cap for Formula 1, Ferrari has insisted that it is 'not worried' and has contended that the governing body 'broke' the Concorde Agreement in implementing the new regulations – but it has now emerged by contrast that the same agreement could in fact prevent the Scuderia from quitting the sport.

Ferrari took its stand-off with the FIA up to another level in endeavouring to seek assistance from the Tribunal de Grande Instance in Paris, having already threatened to walk away from the top flight over what it deems would be a 'fundamentally unfair and perhaps even biased', 'watered-down' two-tier championship of haves and have-nots under a cost cap.

Though FIA President Max Mosley has repeatedly claimed that 'the sport would survive' without its longest-serving and most loyal entrant, as the only team to have begun every single campaign since the official inception of the world championship all the way back in 1950, should it indeed pull out the legendary Italian marque's loss would doubtless be keenly felt.

With time fast running out and the acrimonious dispute still seemingly at a stalemate, further crisis talks are set to be held in Monte Carlo today (Friday) ahead of this weekend's Monaco Grand Prix – invariably the jewel in the season's crown, but this year being somewhat overshadowed by all of the off-track politics and machinations going on in the background. Mosley has allowed teams in the guise of the Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA) until next week to come up with a satisfactory alternative to the cost cap before the stipulated deadline of 29 May for all 2010 entries to be lodged.

In arguing its case in court, Ferrari made clear its conviction that in driving through the cap without first consulting competitors about it, the FIA had reneged on exclusive rights it guaranteed to the team in 2005 in exchange for the secret €100 million deal brokered by Luca di Montezemolo that quashed the danger of a manufacturer-led breakaway series and led to the signing of the new commercial rights-based Concorde Agreement.

It now appears, however, that since the Tribunal de Grande Instance recognised the legality of the Concorde Agreement, Ferrari may in fact be contractually-bound to honour its own side of the bargain, by which it committed to F1 until 2012. The Maranello-based outfit is arguing that the governing body has failed to abide by the 2005 deal and is continuing to debate the wisdom of further legal action, with the FIA countering that Ferrari gave up their special rights when they helped to form FOTA.

Mosley insists that teams can only bid to change or prevent changes in the regulations once they have signed up to the season, but with their 'right of veto' – similarly granted under the terms of the secret deal – also having been recognised by the Parisian court, the 31-time world champions remain adamant that the battle is far from over yet.

“We are not worried,” a Ferrari spokesman is quoted as having said by the Daily Telegraph. “The court recognised the validity of the Concorde Agreement, and we are now deciding whether or not to continue with our legal action. We are hoping it will not come to this and that we can find a way forward.

“Ultimately, if the Concorde Agreement is binding, then the FIA broke it when they changed the sporting rules without respecting the agreed procedures, which state that only the F1 Commission can do so.”

Having yesterday revealed his 'concern' that Ferrari will actually follow through with their threat to walk away, F1 ringmaster Bernie Ecclestone has since sought to qualify his admission in insisting that the sport will go on regardless, urging: “Formula 1 will continue. We have a contract worldwide with TV and promoters, so we will continue like that. We'll be here.”


Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Ferrari F60, Spanish F1 Grand Prix, Catalunya, 8th-10th, May, 2009
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
French Grand Prix at Paul Ricard
Lando Norris, McLaren Autosport BRDC Awards [Credit: Martyn Pass PR]
Kimi Raikkonen tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Lewis Hamilton tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Daniel Ricciardo tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Kimi Raikkonen tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Pirelli 2017 tyre test [Credit: Pirelli]
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Burt - Unregistered

May 22, 2009 12:23 PM

I hate Bernie and Max but they should make Ferrari pay back the £100m and throw them out of the championship. Good riddance they are always winging like spoilt brats as soon as they are not winning. Their arguement is that in order to be competative they need to spend 3 to 4 times as much as the other teams. ie we are not as good at it as them but if we throw enough money at it smaller teams cannot afford to compete so we win by spending the most money. Not by actually being any good at what they do. How does this equate with the premier motor sport event ethos?



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.