F1 »

Briatore: Budget cap 'devaluing' F1's image

Flavio Briatore has echoed Ferrari's accusation that Max Mosley's controversial Formula 1 budget cap will 'devalue' what is currently the pinnacle of international motorsport and 'bring down our image and our technology'.

In a scathing statement on its website last week, the Scuderia blasted: 'Wirth Research, Lola, US GPE, Epsilon Euskadi, RML, Formtech, Campos, iSport – these are the names of the teams which would compete in the two-tier Formula 1 wanted by Mosley.

'Can a world championship with teams like them – with due respect – have the same value as today's Formula 1, where Ferrari, the big car manufacturers and teams who created the history of this sport compete? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to call it Formula GP3?'

Briatore, it would seem, entirely agrees with Ferrari's vision of a 'watered-down' F1 – and with the deadline for all 2010 entries to be made approaching apace later this week on 29 May, the Italian suggested the impending crisis and loss of image as he sees it could easily be averted if only governing body the FIA listened to and acted upon the teams' fears and desires.

“We are devaluing Formula 1,” the Renault F1 managing director insisted in an interview with Spanish newspaper El Mundo. “It is not correct that teams of GP2 race with us; it brings down our image and our technology.

“It is said that the constructors will go, but with normal regulations, I do not believe that any constructor would go. What we cannot have is F1 with a little bit of Formula Two and a little bit of GP2. The small teams have to have success on the basis of their results.

“I began with a small team, Benetton, and with clear regulations we competed with McLaren and Ferrari and won in 1994 and '95 with a budget 80 per cent smaller. We never asked for different regulations. We want a Formula 1 that is unique, with the best technology and the best teams and drivers.”


Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Flavio Briatore (ITA) Renault Team Principal, Australian F1 Grand Prix, Albert Park, Melbourne, 27-29th, March, 2009
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
French Grand Prix at Paul Ricard
Lando Norris, McLaren Autosport BRDC Awards [Credit: Martyn Pass PR]
Kimi Raikkonen tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Lewis Hamilton tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Daniel Ricciardo tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Kimi Raikkonen tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Pirelli 2017 tyre test [Credit: Pirelli]
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Allan

May 27, 2009 11:31 PM

Part of the problem is that F1 is no longer about technology or innovation. Its only about who can find a little snippit of an advantage in creative rule reading. Hell, a WRC car can out accellerate an F1 car these days, and do that on gravel. The current set of stupid rules has no relevance to doing anything to promote creative engineering or progressing technology. Part of the reason for insane spending, through looking for silly little changes and being unable to progress on creative new solutions. Let the engineers run free, give them a box, and tell them the car must fit it and anything goes! Not the current BS we now have.



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.