F1 »

Did Mosley about-turn lead to FOTA breakaway announcement?

The reasons that prompted the Formula One Teams' Association's sudden announcement that it was to press ahead with its 'breakaway' threat are starting to become clearer, with rumours in the F1 paddock that an eleventh-hour switch from FIA President Max Mosley was the catalyst for the move.

Shortly after midnight on Thursday night, FOTA sent out a statement that following a breakdown in communication with the governing body, it intended to follow through with its menace of organising its own separate championship, well away from Mosley's controversial jurisdiction.

According to the BBC, a compromise deal had been struck in principle 24 hours earlier that would have seen all eight of the rebel teams agree to sign up to compete in the top flight in 2010, but when the paperwork was received the following morning, it is understood that Mosley had changed the date until which they had to pledge their commitment from 2012 to 2014 – what is believed to have been the final straw that broke the camel's back and lit the blue touch paper for the decision to withdraw en masse.

Following further discussions at Renault's F1 headquarters at Enstone in Oxfordshire during the course of Thursday, the resolution to split was made – with increasing unease at the autocratic and almost arbitrary manner in which Mosley is ruling the sport, and the feeling that the only way the dissenters can be tempted back into the fray would be if the Englishman were to resign from the most powerful and influential post in international motor racing. However, that is something with which the latter seems far from willing to comply, hinting that in the midst of a crisis, the last thing he would do is step down [see separate story – click here].

Moreover, there is anger at the tone of the string of press releases issued by the FIA late last week, which tended to depict the governing body as the goodies, and FOTA as the baddies – something the teams argue is at best a flagrant misrepresentation, at worst a blatant lie.

It is believed that FOTA and Ferrari President Luca di Montezemolo – a man who has become a sworn enemy of Mosley's in recent weeks – will endeavour to undermine the 69-year-old's authority at Wednesday's reunion of the FIA World Motor Sport Council (WMSC), but in the meantime discussions continue, despite the outward finality of FOTA's announcement.

Chief FIA steward Alan Donnelly – Mosley's right-hand man, and one unpopular amongst many of the teams – met with team principals Stefano Domenicali (Ferrari), John Howett (Toyota), Ross Brawn (Brawn GP) and Christian Horner (Red Bull Racing) in the Silverstone paddock on Sunday morning in an effort to try to find some common ground. Mosley has suggested that those four teams are the most receptive to his proposals, contentiously dismissing the other four members – Renault, McLaren-Mercedes, BMW-Sauber and Scuderia Toro Rosso – as 'loonies'. The problem for the teams is that they have no guarantee that the FIA President will do as he promises.

Even in the areas where he is willing to make concessions, indeed, it seems there are issues, with suggestions that the uncapped teams would be unfairly penalised in relation to their capped rivals running customer Cosworth engines. Whilst the free-spending competitors would be restricted to 18,000rpm as per the existing 2009 regulations, the Cosworth powerplant would not be subject to a rev limit, with Mosley having argued in a letter that 'any engineer will confirm that this will not give the relevant teams any competitive advantage whatsoever' – a contention that has been rubbished by those in the know.

According to the BBC, the Cosworth-powered cars would be quicker in qualifying – with ten per cent extra power equating to in excess of 70bhp more than their adversaries – but slower in the initial stages of a grand prix due to their higher-revving engines requiring more fuel as a result of the 2010 ban on refuelling. That could lead to situations where the Cosworth cars might hold up the rev-limited machines early on in the race, before picking up pace as the fuel burns off – leading to a clear advantage for the cost-capped teams.

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Max Mosley
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Girl in the paddock
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Stoffel Vandoorne (BEL) McLaren MCL32
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB13
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Daniil Kvyat (RUS) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Stoffel Vandoorne (BEL) McLaren MCL32
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Esteban Ocon (FRA) Sahara Force India F1 VJM10
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB13
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Marcus Ericsson (SUE) Sauber C36
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Felipe Massa (BRA) Williams FW40
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Felipe Massa (BRA) Williams FW40 and Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
29.04.2017 - Free Practice 3, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


June 22, 2009 12:41 PM

Calling companies like Mercedes BMW and ferrari "loonies" then pushing back the date 2 years on the agreement they nearly had with FOTA. IS HE FOR REAL? IS HE REALLY THE PRESIDENT OF A BIG ORGANISATION? CAN HE NOT SEE THE ERROR OF HIS WAYS? That there is still negotiations is a credit to FOTA. This man would not see what hit him in my office! His style of management is reminiscent to his sexual tastes. Both leave a bad taste....

Mark - Unregistered

June 22, 2009 12:46 PM

Why do I get the horrible feeling that a compromise will be made by the FIA and FOTA and us fans will get a watered down championship run (dictated?) by the same old faces. I don't want it to happen but i've got a nasty feeling it will. This whole thing is getting very old very quickly and I for one am getting sick of it. A friend's young son asked me what all this meant for next year. The poor kid was totally confused when I told him. There can't many feet left on the people from the FIA because they're doing a really good job of shooting them at the moment.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.