F1 »

Teams complain about Cosworth requirement for 2010 entry.

Formula One bosses appear poised to have to fend off another controversy ahead of this weekend's German Grand Prix, amid claims that they 'hand-picked' newcomers for the 2010 championship based on their willingness to use Cosworth engines.

According to reports in the Daily Telegraph's business section over the weekend, the FIA stands accused of 'commercial bias' in its decision to offer entries to US F1, Campos Grand Prix and Manor F1 - who are scheduled to join the existing ten teams on the grid next season - ahead of more established names such as Prodrive/Aston Martin and Lola, both of which were widely assumed to have been 'kept back' in order to exert extra leverage on the dissident FOTA teams in the battle for control between the teams organisation and FIA president Max Mosley.

The report claims that many of the twelve teams overlooked for a place in F1's new-look line-up have now revealed that they had been told that running engines from Cosworth - which won an FIA tender to supply a spec-engine to the category - was a 'mandatory condition' for selection by the governing body. Unaware of the requirement, the disgruntled teams submitted their bids with plans to use alternative power suppliers - with one believed to have spent £1m preparing its bid.

"We were told that, if we wanted to take up the 2010 grid slot, we would have to sign a three-year engine contract with Cosworth," one team boss claimed, while another insisted that his outfit 'had a real possibility of obtaining a Renault, Mercedes or Ferrari engine'.

As Cosworth insisted that it did not put pressure on the FIA to impose such a condition on entry, a third team insisted that the newcomers had been 'hand-picked for political, rather than sport[ing] criteria', underlining suggestions that, with current engine suppliers BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari, Renault and Toyota all potentially involved in the proposed FOTA breakaway, the FIA needed to find an independent alternative that would render such a pressure scenario unlikely in future.

"The whole grid would be at the mercy of the car industry and no new team would be able to enter without their permission," an FIA spokesman confirmed.

US F1, Campos and Manor all came through the selection process designed to fill at least three places on the 2010 F1 grid after the FIA opened up extra grid slots in a bid to 'improve the show'. Although the potential of additional entries was closed by the peace accord hammered out between Mosley and FOTA, many of the teams missing out in the initial selection had revealed that they remained in conversation with the governing body should an opening become available.

Brawn GP CEO Nick Fry has also intimated that the 2010 grid is not yet set in stone, particularly as the three newcomers had all submitted their bids on the basis of the sport being subjected to a £40m budget cap - an idea scrapped as part of the deal that brought the two warring factions together shortly after the British Grand Prix.


Tagged as: 2010 , manor , Campos , Cosworth , engine , entry list

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
05.10.2006 Suzuka, Japan, WilliamsF1 Team, FW28 Cosworth, engine cover - Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 17, Japanese Grand Prix
27.11.2016 - Race, Kevin Magnussen (DEN) Renault Sport F1 Team RS16 and Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Race, Carlos Sainz Jr (ESP) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR11 leads Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Race, Esteban Ocon (FRA) Manor Racing MRT05, Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05 and Felipe Nasr (BRA) Sauber C34
27.11.2016 - Race, Start of the race, Daniil Kvyat (RUS) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR11 and Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Race, Esteban Ocon (FRA) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Race, Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Manor Racing goup photo, Esteban Ocon (FRA) Manor Racing MRT05, Jordan King (GBR) Manor Racing, Test Driver and Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Jock Clear (GBR) Ferrari Engineering Director, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H and Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
27.11.2016 - Jock Clear (GBR) Ferrari Engineering Director, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H and Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
27.11.2016 - Jordan King (GBR) Manor Racing MRT05, Test Driver
27.11.2016 - Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Esteban Ocon (FRA) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
27.11.2016 - Esteban Ocon (FRA) Manor Racing MRT05, Jordan King (GBR) Manor Racing MRT05, Test Driver and Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
26.11.2016 - Qualifying, Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
26.11.2016 - Qualifying, Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05
26.11.2016 - Qualifying, Pascal Wehrlein (GER) Manor Racing MRT05

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Chris - Unregistered

July 06, 2009 1:59 PM

The re-introduction of a private engine manufacturer was pretty important. I've always sensed that having private teams buying engines off of manufacturers (i.e. Williams Toyota) often had negative side effects (e.g. Williams being forced to run Nakajima). I believe that in the past, some teams running Ferrari customer engines required the revs be turned down. So it's not such a bad thing that Cosworth will have a pretty big foot in the door of F1 again. In an ideal world, all the engine manufacturers would be seperate to chassis builders. Of course, as usual, the FIA's methods are questionable at best.

autogyro - Unregistered

July 06, 2009 8:10 PM

F1 is not a democracy, pay attention at the back there. Bernie owns F1 and the FIA run it for the owner as well as the fans and teams. If you do not like it then buy it if you can. Letting the big car manufacturers monopolies engine supply is a complete no no and would aid them through Fota in their attempt to oust Max and Bernie. The car manufacturers and the oil companies cannot afford to even look a the coming electric car revolution when they rely solely on the public for tax bail outs and the oil wars for further revenue.



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.