29 January 2010
Ferrari planning B-spec car?
Ferrari's senior technical staff discuss the design of the new F10, while rumours suggest that a B-spec car could already be in the offing.
The double cancellation of Ferrari's planned shakedown of the new F10 at Fiorano won't have major implications for the team's early-season performance, but there could still be trouble ahead if rumours in the Italian media prove to be true.
Although Ferrari is maintaining that Felipe Massa's debut in the 2010 contender was canned on both Thursday and Friday because of ice and snow at its private test facility, speculation in the press suggests that the F10 is already failing to live up to expectation, with a 'B-spec' version already being considered at Maranello as the team leaves for the first group test of the season in Valencia, which starts on Monday [1 February].
Of course, there was no such suggestion at the launch in Maranello on Thursday, with the engineering and design team revealing details of the car they hope will return the Prancing Horse to the top step of the podium on a regular basis this season. With Massa sidelined just after half-distance in last year's campaign, and Kimi Raikkonen managing just a single victory for the team, there is a lot riding on the F10 as the Brazilian and new team-mate Fernando Alonso chase the world title.
Among the first questions put to the various technical staff at the launch was an explanation of why the F10 would succeed where last year's F60 failed.
“We think that it was necessary to interrupt working on the F60's development, also because we didn't have the possibility to win the championship," Aldo Costa reasoned, "Now we're trying to forget last year and concentrate on 2010. But the decision was strategic, agreed on by the technicians and Stefano Domenicali.”
“We analysed the reasons why we weren't strong enough last year – car, organisation, approach," Nikolas Tombazis added, "The development data regarding aerodynamics, simulator and test stand makes us think that lots of development has been done. We also worked to speed up the change of tyres. In the last few years, the refuelling limited us, but this year this is different, so we worked, regarding the pit-stop, on the change of tyres.”
Tombazis was asked about the aerodynamics and the fundamental role the weight displacement played - whether it was always the best solution to have more downforce at the back of the car.
“In aerodynamics, rear downforce is harder to find" he explained, "We're always looking to improve the car's efficiency to improve the performance. As far as the car's set-up is concerned, we do have some doubts about it, due to the fact that we haven't used the new tyres yet. The KERS is gone, but the minimum weight has been raised. There's more ballast to adjust the weight in case there were problems with the distribution.
“KERS, in reality, worked very well, although it did create a certain deficit on the car's overall package. The fact that it's gone made us lose a performance delta but, by space-saving, we gained what we lost with the KERS.”
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.