Former F1 star David Coulthard
has waded into the row over the new teams joining the grand prix grid in 2010, arguing that the top flight is 'not a finishing school', branding the sorry saga of USF1 'a poor advertisement' and one that 'degrades the sport' and contending that the lack of mileage conducted by some of the newcomers ahead of the curtain-raising Bahrain Grand Prix
this weekend is 'plain irresponsible'.
Ferrari courted controversy last month by launching a scathing and scornful attack on the state of the new arrivals, describing the ultimately unsuccessful Stefan GP as 'vultures' trying to feed off struggling rivals, forecasting that Virgin and Lotus will merely 'limp into the start of the championship', slating Hispania for having been 'pushed into the ring by an invisible hand' – with the clear inference being that the hand in question belonged to influential F1 commercial rights-holder Bernie Ecclestone – and concluded that 'you would do better to call on Missing Persons to locate' USF1 [see separate story – click here
The American effort, of course, ultimately never made it, and Stefan was turned down in its bid to step into the void. Hispania will arrive in Sakhir with no prior running under its belt with its Dallara-designed, Cosworth-powered challenger, whilst despite being the earliest to get its car on-track, Virgin's pre-season preparations have been persistently stymied by hydraulic woes and other recurring reliability glitches.
came in for a considerable degree of disapprobation for its extraordinary outburst, Coulthard concedes that he does 'have some sympathy' for the Scuderia's
“I am going to end up sounding like a bit of a Scrooge here,” the 13-time grand prix-winner acknowledged, writing in the Daily Telegraph
, “but before we all start waxing lyrical about the impending blockbuster of a season, I want to address something that worries me greatly – the standard, or lack thereof, of the new teams on the grid for 2010.
“I have heard a lot in recent months about how great it is to have 'fresh blood' in the sport, [but] Formula 1 is not a finishing school. Either you come prepared, or prepare to fail. This is the pinnacle of world motorsport. It's no use them bleating about the fact that the goalposts moved after they joined under a £40 million budget cap. The Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA) never signed up to that cap.
“Fresh blood is all well-and-good, but I would argue that the carry-on we have seen over the past few months has been a poor advertisement for F1. First it was going to be four new teams, then Bernie Ecclestone admitted he thought only two of them would make it. Then USF1 collapsed and died, along with the reputations of Ken Anderson and Peter Windsor, who cried wolf so many times.
“Finally we are left with three new outfits – Virgin Racing, Lotus and Hispania Racing – although the last of these launched only last week following a last-minute change of ownership and has never turned a wheel in testing. Has the world gone mad? F1 is a dangerous sport at the best of times, but asking teams to just turn up at practice on a Friday before a race is plain irresponsible.
“For a team that has been up-and-running for years, it is difficult enough to pass the stringent FIA crash tests while accumulating adequate miles to prove the integrity of parts which are not required to be tested – for instance suspension parts, which as a reminder to all keep the wheels attached to the car.