F1 »

Could Alonso have overcome Ferrari's fuel consumption?

It has been claimed that Fernando Alonso may have had to rely on his superior tyre management to win the Bahrain GP without Sebastian Vettel's problems.
The difference in fuel consumption between the best on the Formula One grid and the worst could have set up a more exciting finish to the season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix, according to pit-lane sources.

Of course, the claim remains hypothetical after polesitter and early leader Sebastian Vettel's Red Bull went lame, but BBC pit-lane reporter Ted Kravitz believes that the German and Fernando Alonso could have been nose-to-tail in the final few laps thanks to their respective tyre management abilities.

Alonso made no secret of the fact that he was trying to preserve his tyres for a late assault on Vettel [see story here], while the German's rear rubber showed signs of increasing wear, prompting Kravitz to claim that the final ten laps - when the two cars would have been running on roughly similar fuel levels - would have been more closely fought than much of the race as a whole.

The new 2010 regulations have been panned for producing a bland opening round, devoid of action on track, but the fact that Red Bull allegedly went to the grid with ten kilogrammes less fuel that the more potent Ferrari adds weight to Kravitz's proposition. He cites Williams' technical director Sam Michael as confirming that Renault, which supplies Red Bull with engines, has the most fuel efficient V8 on the grid, with Ferrari potentially the worst in the consumption stakes.

According to Michael's calculations, reported on planet-f1.com, Vettel would have been able to open out nearly ten seconds over his pursuers over the course of the 49-lap race. However, when tyre wear is factored in, the gap would have closed in the final stages, as both cars whittled their load down to roughly the same amount for the sprint to the flag.

"Had Vettel not had his problem, we would likely have enjoyed a fight for the lead between Alonso, who had been nursing his tyres throughout the race, and Vettel, with his rear tyres starting to fade," he argued, "At any other stage of the race, it would not have been a fair fight, as Vettel would have been significantly lighter on fuel, but we should bear this in mind in the inevitable debates about the first race being boring."



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Felipe Massa (BRA) Scuderia Ferrari F10 & Fernando Alonso (ESP) Scuderia Ferrari F10
Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB 6
Fernando Alonso (ESP) Scuderia Ferrari F10
02.10.2014 - Press conference, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07, Jules Bianchi (FRA) Marussia F1 Team MR03, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Lotus F1 Team E22, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB10, Kamui Kobayashi (JAP) Caterham F1 Team CT-04 and Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-29
02.10.2014 - Press conference, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07, Jules Bianchi (FRA) Marussia F1 Team MR03, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Lotus F1 Team E22, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB10, Kamui Kobayashi (JAP) Caterham F1 Team CT-04 and Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-29
02.10.2014 - Press conference, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB10
02.10.2014 - Press conference, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB10
02.10.2014 - Press conference, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB10
02.10.2014 - Red Bull Racing RB10, detail
02.10.2014 - Red Bull Racing RB10, detail
02.10.2014 - Scuderia Ferrari F14-T, detail
02.10.2014 - Red Bull Racing RB10, detail
02.10.2014 - Fernando Alonso (ESP) Scuderia Ferrari F14-T and his Luis Garcia Abad (ESP), manager of Fernando Alonso (ESP)
02.10.2014 - Fernando Alonso (ESP) Scuderia Ferrari F14-T and his Luis Garcia Abad (ESP), manager of Fernando Alonso (ESP)
02.10.2014 - Ferrari Hospitality
02.10.2014 - (L) Marco Mattiacci (ITA) Team Principal, Scuderia Ferrari
02.10.2014 - Marco Mattiacci (ITA) Team Principal, Scuderia Ferrari
02.10.2014 - Sam Michael (AUS) McLaren Sporting Director

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Johny Margolis - Unregistered

March 21, 2010 10:23 AM

This is a good story and so true. I believe FA would have passed SV but it would have been very hard due to Aero & Tyre issues however I feel SV would have perhaps made a mistake allowing FA past as oppose to a fight.



© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.