F1 »

FIA clarifies ride-height regulations

As McLaren points the finger of guilt at title rival Red Bull Racing, F1's governing body the FIA has made it very clear that any adjustable ride-height device designed 'to change the set-up of the suspension whilst the car is under parc fermé conditions' is strictly illegal
F1 governing body the FIA has sought to clarify the regulations regarding adjustable suspension and ride-heights in the top flight – releasing an official warning that any device used to alter the distance between the underbody of the chassis and the track from qualifying to the race is strictly prohibited.

Red Bull Racing – which has started each of the opening three grands prix of the F1 2010 campaign from pole position, and which finally achieved what it had been threatening to do right from the 'off' by sweeping to a commanding one-two in Malaysia last weekend – has been accused by fellow front-runner McLaren-Mercedes of running a special ride-height function.

That is the conviction of the Woking-based outfit's team principal Martin Whitmarsh, who opined at the Australian Grand Prix last month that Red Bull is employing a system in contravention of the sport's rules. In response to that, McLaren is now hurriedly rushing to play catch-up should its rival's development be declared lawful, in a situation that would echo the 'double-decker' diffuser controversy of this time last year – the very débâcle that led to steps being implemented that were supposed to ensure far greater transparency in 2010...

“Frankly, a few months ago if the engineers had come to me and said, 'We're going to design this ride-height control system', I would have said, 'Actually, I don't think it's permissible',” Whitmarsh told the BBC in Melbourne. “There's some evidence that perhaps such systems are considered legal; it looks like Red Bull and some other cars are able to run lower in qualifying than you would expect if they're then going to fill the car with fuel afterwards.

“The original rulings suggested such systems wouldn't be allowed on cars, but we're seeing some cars which seem to have them. If they do, then we're going to get one as quick as we can. As you can imagine, we're working quite hard on those systems now. We've got to have them fitted as soon as we can – hopefully by China we'll have something on the car.”

RBR counterpart Christian Horner has hit back by insisting he can 'absolutely guarantee' that no such system is in-place on the Adrian Newey-designed RB6 – adding that the energy drinks-backed concern would protest any team that did use one.

Active ride-height innovations were pioneered by the original Team Lotus, and brought great success to Williams in the early 1990s before being banned in 1993 in the interests of equality. The main benefit afforded now would be to allow a car that qualifies on a light fuel load enough ground clearance when the tank is subsequently filled to the brim on race day.

'Any system, device or procedure, the purpose and/or the effect of which is to change the set-up of the suspension whilst the car is under parc fermé conditions, will be deemed to contravene Article 34.5 of the F1 Sporting Regulations,' read an FIA missive. 'Any self-levelling damper system is likely to contravene (Article) 3.15 of the technical regulations.'

Should any alterations be made to a car's suspension under parc fermé regulations, the driver is subsequently obliged to begin the grand prix from the pit-lane.

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Christian Horner, Team Principal, Red Bull Racing
Martin Whitmarsh, Team Principal, McLaren Mercedes
Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER), Red Bull Racing, RB6 race winner
FIA flag. British Formula One Grand Prix.Silverstone, UK.July 8th 2007.
23.03.2017 - Steering wheel  Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Sahara Force India F1 VJM010
23.03.2017 - detail Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - detail Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - detail Mercedes AMG F1 W08
23.03.2017 - Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
23.03.2017 - Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - Stoffel Vandoorne (BEL) McLaren MCL32
23.03.2017 - Cyril Abiteboul (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Managing Director and Alain Prost (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Team Special Advisor
23.03.2017 - Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
23.03.2017 -Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

tomracer - Unregistered

April 08, 2010 6:57 PM

@spaghettieddie ...dude way to even read the dam article it says that the FIA clarified that any alteration to the ride height after parc ferme is illegal... read before posting...2nd whitmarsh said that before last australian gp they just copied and pasted it in their for a larger article.

gpfan - Unregistered

April 08, 2010 11:12 PM

Some suggest that it may be super cold gas in the shocks. This would lower the suspension for qualifying, then overnight the cold gas would lose its temperature raising the car. I really enjoy seeing teams find tricks in the grey areas.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.