F1 »

Drivers question safety of moveable rear wing

Some of F1's most experienced campaigners - Lotus' Jarno Trulli, Red Bull Racing's Mark Webber, Renault's Robert Kubica, Williams' Rubens Barrichello and Force India's Adrian Sutil - have expressed their fears about the new driver-operated moveable rear wings for 2011
A number of F1's most experienced drivers have expressed their concerns about the new, driver-operated moveable 'proximity' rear wings that are due to be introduced into the top flight in 2011 – with some fearful about the safety of the device and others opining that 'there is not a lot of entertainment in seeing cars overtake each other on a straight'.

The driver-adjustable bodywork initiative was proposed by the Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA), and it has been ratified by governing body the FIA in an effort to spice up the spectacle and facilitate passing manoeuvres at the highest level. The rear wing will be operated via a button inside the cockpit that opens up a slot to boost straight-line speed, when it is electronically detected that a driver is within a second of the car in front at one of several pre-determined positions around the circuit.

“It has been agreed to ban the F-duct system, but in its place we will have a rear wing with a flap that is adjustable by the driver,” explained McLaren-Mercedes' engineering director Paddy Lowe in a special Vodafone McLaren-Mercedes Phone-In Session. “We will raise the flap so it produces low drag down the straights, and in qualifying, every driver will have the opportunity to set a better lap time through using it wherever he can.

“In the race, you won't be able to use it at all in the first two laps, and then after that if you are within a second of the car in front, you will be able to deploy it. That's a FOTA initiative to help improve the show, and it will be very interesting. I think it's very exciting.”

Others, however, are rather more circumspect about the new aerodynamic innovation, with Lotus Racing's Jarno Trulli warning that as teams desperately bid to out-develop each other with their own versions of the 'proximity' rear wing, somewhere along the line, something is likely to go wrong...

“We have to make sure that they are safe,” the Italian veteran of some 223 F1 starts is quoted as having said by Reuters in Valencia, where he is preparing for this weekend's European Grand Prix around the harbourside streets of the Spanish city. “I have lost the rear wing several times in my career, and it's not a nice feeling – it's one of the most dangerous things you can have [happen], actually. I was lucky every time, but if you're not it would be bad.

“When it happens, you are not in control of your car anymore, and when it fails, normally it happens at very high speed – because it's the forces that make it fail – and you are going to end up in the wall. I don't want to have to worry about rear wing failure. Front wing failure is slightly different, even though it's still a problem – but the rear wing is really bad.

“We are definitely all looking for a better show and more overtaking, that's clear, and if this can help then it's very welcome – but it's looking a bit too complicated with the conditions under which you can use it. I would personally suggest to the FIA that they should design and give the same rear wing to everyone. Otherwise, if we start making research and stuff into the rear wing, it will go lighter...and in the end, someone's will fail.”

Many of Trulli's colleagues agree with the Pescara native that more thought needs to be given to the idea before it goes ahead, with Renault star Robert Kubica confessing that he doesn't think 'there is a lot of entertainment in seeing cars overtake each other on a straight' and Rubens Barrichello – the most experienced driver in F1 history – revealing his scepticism regarding 'the idea that the one in front cannot use it and the one behind can'.

“To be honest, it's a bit like a PlayStation game when you have nitro or something,” echoed Force India ace Adrian Sutil. “It's very good for the show, [but] it's not so good from a driving point-of-view, because [even] if you defend your position well it doesn't really matter.”

“It is good for the PlayStation, I think,” concurred Red Bull Racing's erstwhile world championship leader Mark Webber, “but I don't know how well it is going to work in F1. Overtaking moves should be about pressurising, being skilful and tactical. Yes, we want to see more overtaking, of course we do, we know that, but we also need to keep the element of skill involved in overtaking and not just hitting buttons. In an IRL race where you pass each other four times per lap, everyone gets bored.”

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Saturday Practice, Rubens Barrichello (BRA), Williams, FW32
Friday Practice 1, Adrian Sutil (GER), Force India F1 Team, VJM03
Wednesday, Robert Kubica (POL), Renault F1 Team, R30
29.01.2010 Newbury, England, rear wing - car detail - Vodafone Mclaren Mercedes MP4-25 Launch
31.01.2010 Valencia, Spain The new Renault R30 rear wing detail - Renault F1 Team Launch
Qualifying, Mark Webber (AUS), Red Bull Racing, RB6
Friday Practice 1, Jarno Trulli (ITA), Lotus Racing, T127
George Russell - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Turn 8 kerb tweaked after Friday accidents
23.06.2017 - Free Practice 2, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
23.06.2017 - Free Practice 2, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
23.06.2017 - Free Practice 2, Mercedes AMG F1 W08, detail
23.06.2017 - Press conference, Cyril Abiteboul (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Managing Director
23.06.2017 - Free Practice 2, Robert Fernley (GBR) Sahara Force India F1 Team Deputy Team Principal
23.06.2017 - Press conference, Robert Fernley (GBR) Sahara Force India F1 Team Deputy Team Principal, Eric Boullier (FRA) McLaren Racing Director and Cyril Abiteboul (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Managing Director
23.06.2017 - Press conference, Jock Clear (GBR) Ferrari Engineering Director and Rob Smedley (GBR) Williams Head of Vehicle Performance
23.06.2017 - Free Practice 2, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.06.2017 - Free Practice 2, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

Homer - Unregistered

June 25, 2010 3:56 PM

Maybe I am missing something here, as I don't know exactly how these things work, but why is the F-duct banned, but this allowed? Both appear to do much the same thing, use a button to affect airflow over rear wing in order to gain extra speed? so why is one banned and the other Ok?

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.