F1 » 26 June 2010
Mosley responds to opposition in privacy fight
Max Mosley has stepped up his campaign for the right to privacy following opposition to his application to the European Court of Human Rights.
Former FIA president Max Mosley continues to pursue the right to privacy that he feels he was denied when sordid stories about his sex life appeared in the media two years ago, despite opposition to his legal crusade.
Mosley, who was replaced as president of motorsport's governing body by Jean Todt in 2009, found himself moving from the back pages to the main headline of the British tabloid press after reports of his involvement in 'a Nazi-themed orgy', and has since attempted to rewrite the UK's privacy laws by campaigning for the right of subjects to be notified before such allegations are made public.
"Mr Mosley's case is simple," his solicitors, Collyer Bristow, insisted, "Without an obligation to notify, a newspaper can publish information which irrevocably destroys a person's privacy. Even if publication is unlawful, the victim is left without an effective remedy. No court can remove the information from the public mind once it has been published. The damage is done - and it is permanent."
Although Mosley won damages of £60,000 against the News of the World following its extended 'coverage' of the story, he has made it a personal campaign to see the law changed to prevent others from having to suffer the indignity of having their private lives revealed to the public.
"The only effective means of protecting privacy is to prevent publication and thus stop an illegal breach before it happens," Collyer Bristow's statement continued, "But you cannot do that if you don't know about it in advance. A legal action for breach of privacy after publication is not an effective remedy, [and] furthermore it attracts publicity which may worsen the victim's position. As a result, a victim very rarely sues. Our uniquely intrusive tabloid newspapers know that they can circumvent the individual's right to privacy by concealing their intention to publish, [and] it is only by compelling newspapers to notify those about whom they intend to publish private information, that the UK can fulfil its obligations under the Convention."
Mosley's bid to have the laws rewritten, however, have naturally faced opposition, with sections of the media claiming that enforcing the right to notification 'would have a truly draconian effect on the media acting in the public interest as an independent public watchdog'. According to journalism.co.uk, the UK government has also contested Mosley's argument and called on the European court to rule his application 'inadmissible' as he 'is no longer a victim and has failed to exhaust all his domestic remedies'.
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Join the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.