F1 »

Sponsors win Force India appeal

Force India loses out on windfall after court of appeal rules in sponsors favour
The UK Court of Appeal has ruled that Etihad Airways and Aldar don't have to pay damages to the Force India team for the early termination of a sponsorship agreement.

It was announced last year by the High Court that the two Abu Dhabi companies had to pay Force India a sum of nearly $5 million for terminating a three-year deal that had been signed while the team was still known as Spyker.

However, the Court of Appeal has ruled that the change of ownership and subsequent rebranding of the team had occurred without the consent of the two sponsors and ruled that no financial penalty should be paid to the team.

“Etihad and Aldar had entered into a three-year sponsorship agreement with the Spyker Formula 1 Team in 2007,” an Etihad statement read. “Following a change in ownership, the name of the team was changed to Force India Formula 1 Team and the car was completely rebranded, without the approval of the main sponsors, Etihad and Aldar.

“The Court of Appeal confirmed that as a result of this, and other material breaches by Force India of the contract, Etihad and Aldar were within their contractual rights to terminate the sponsorship agreement.

“As a result, the Court of Appeal reversed the earlier decision of the High Court, and found that Etihad and Aldar were not only entitled to terminate the contract but that Force India was in breach of their contractual obligations.

“The Appeal Court has therefore ordered the case to be referred back to the Queen's Bench Division for an assessment of Etihad 's and Aldar's damages, and ordered Force India to pay Etihad's and Aldar's costs of the proceedings.”


Tagged as: Force India F1 , Spyker , etihad , aldar

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Race, Vitantonio Liuzzi (ITA), Force India F1 Team, VJM03 and Jaime Alguersuari (SPA), Scuderia Toro Rosso, STR5
Qualifying, Adrian Sutil (GER), Force India F1 Team, VJM03
Qualifying, Adrian Sutil (GER), Force India F1 Team, VJM03
27.11.2016 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Race, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Race, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Race, Start of the race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09 leads Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Race,  Sahara Force India mechanics
27.11.2016 - Race,  Sahara Force India mechanics
27.11.2016 - Race, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09 and Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Race, Start of the race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09 and Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB12
27.11.2016 - Jenson Button (GBR)  McLaren Honda MP4-31, Carlos Sainz Jr (ESP) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR11 and Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
27.11.2016 - Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09 and Felipe Massa (BRA) Williams FW38
27.11.2016 - Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09 and Felipe Massa (BRA) Williams FW38
27.11.2016 - Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09 fans

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


rbr46

October 08, 2010 8:56 AM

  •   Reply
  •   1 agree
  •   1 disagree

jasen - Unregistered

October 08, 2010 9:29 AM

Jinx follows them one or the other way! Mallaya looks like a good person, don't know why he (or his team) make such ridiculous claims and appeals against their sponsors etc. Always looking to save and mint money from other people. Don't get me wrong, I am a big fan of the team and their people. But this really leaves a bad taste when you certainly know that FI had no base with this claim. Lets hope that Sutil doesn't leave the team next year otherwise they'll be move backwards for sure.



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.