23 November 2010
Gascoyne perplexed as to why 'Group Lotus won't support us'
As the Lotus Racing/Team Lotus/Group Lotus naming row escalates, Mike Gascoyne admits it would be 'a great shame' if those who 'brought the Lotus name back to F1 and did it proud' were to lose it again in 2011
Mike Gascoyne has confessed that he finds Group Lotus' persistent opposition to Tony Fernandes' plans in F1 'slightly perplexing' – admitting that should Lotus Racing be forced to sacrifice the iconic brand in 2011, it would be 'a great shame' for all those who have done the name proud this year.
As the ongoing row between the two parties remains unresolved – with Fernandes' bid to revive the classic 'Team Lotus' moniker blocked by Group Lotus' insistence that he does not own the rights to do so, the subtext being that the latter wishes join the grand prix grid itself next year by buying the remaining 25 per cent of Renault F1 not owned by Gérard Lopez's Genii Capital company – Lotus Racing chief technical officer Mike Gascoyne has spoken out on the matter.
“We don't understand why Group Lotus don't want to support us,” the Englishman told BBC Radio Norfolk. “We think we brought the brand great value. The shareholders have invested something like £80 million into the brand and development of the team.
“I think it's a great shame for everyone in Norfolk because we're a Norfolk-based team, we brought the Lotus name back to F1 and we did it proud. We don't quite understand why we don't have the support of Group Lotus in that – but that's not in my hands. My job doesn't change with the name, and the same with all the engineering staff.”
Indeed, having finished as the best-placed of the F1 2010 newcomers in tenth spot in the final constructors' standings at the end of its maiden campaign of top flight competition, Lotus Racing stands to take a sizeable leap up the pecking order next year after signing an engine-supply agreement with Renault and a gearbox and hydraulics deal with double world champions Red Bull Racing. The only thing is, the team may no longer be able to carry the iconic Lotus name.
“I do not want to comment on Proton's move to enter F1, but their action certainly will have some bearing on [our] team name,” acknowledged Lotus Racing chief executive Riad Asmat, speaking to Malaysian newspaper The Star. “For now, we are preparing our team and we want to be ready for any eventualities. We are definitely going to be there when the  season starts.”
Fernandes was licensed to call the Anglo/Malaysian outfit Lotus Racing by Proton – the owners of Group Lotus – but after the AirAsia founder purchased the rights to the legendary Team Lotus name from David Hunt, brother of 1976 F1 World Champion James Hunt, the Malaysian car maker suddenly rescinded that licence, arguing that the rights had never been Hunt's to sell in the first place, but rather theirs'.
With Renault tipped to be rebadged Lotus-Renault, both 'Team AirAsia' and 'Proton 1Malaysia' have been mooted as potential alternative identities for Lotus Racing in 2011, involving sponsorship for Fernandes' operation from Proton to help compensate for the loss of Formula One Management (FOM) revenue engendered by a name change.
The case is currently awaiting a hearing in the High Court, whilst to add a further element of incredulity into the whole equation, the two warring factions are based just ten miles apart from one another, in Hingham (Lotus Racing) and Hethel (Group Lotus).
Tagged as: Red Bull Racing , Renault , Malaysia , Claudio Berro , Proton , 2011 , Indycar Series , Lotus , Mike Gascoyne , Dany Bahar , Tony Fernandes , fernandes , F1 2010 , riad asmat , AirAsia
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.