F1 »

VW welcomes change of engine in F1

Volkswagen has admitted that the change of engine planned for F1 in 2013 opens the door to a potential involvement in the top flight.

Although it has yet to succumb to the seemingly never-ending rumours linking it to a role in the top flight, Volkswagen has admitted that F1's new engine rules would be more attractive should it change its mind.

The German giant has long been seen as the marque that ought to be in grand prix racing - using any of its subsidiaries, including Porsche and Audi - but always pointed to its other motorsport activities, as well as the existing F1 regulations, as reasons for not making the leap to compete with the likes of Renault, Ferrari and Mercedes. However, following Friday's announcement from the World Motor Sport Council that F1 would be moving to 1.6-litre fuel-injected four-cylinder turbo engines in 2013, VW Motorsport's Hans-Joachim Stuck has conceded that the category now holds new possibilities.

"We welcome the decision," Stuck commented during the FIA Awards evening, "It is not only great news for F1, but for the whole of motorsport, as it takes the sport in the right direction environmentally.

“Of course, we have not decided anything [regarding F1], but the conditions for Volkswagen to possibly enter the category have now been created. The engine rules are a good starting point for Volkswagen.”

As recently as the start of December, new Porsche boss Matthias Mueller suggested that a return for the marque to F1 was unlikely, even if the iconic sportscar badge was the most obvious one for VW to use.

"F1 is a drivers' world championship, with the focus on the sponsors and the manufacturers only secondary," he told Germany's Westfalen Blatt newspaper, "For us, this is a clear drawback for such a long-term investment, as is the unclear rules for the future. [However], if the VW Group was interested, then Porsche would surely be the brand that would work best for this."



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
The car of Max Chilton (GBR) - Carlin Motorsport Dallara Volkswagen
13.03.2015 - Tom  Christensen, FIA Steward
12.03.2015 - Red Bull Racing RB11, detail
12.03.2015 - Red Bull Racing RB11, detail
(L to R): Toni Cuquerella (ESP) Ferrari Lead Engineer with James Allison (GBR) Ferrari Chassis Technical Director.
28.02.2015.
(L to R): Toni Cuquerella (ESP) Ferrari Race Engineer with James Allison (GBR) Ferrari Chassis Technical Director.
28.02.2015.
(L to R): Nick Chester (GBR) Lotus F1 Team Technical Director with Romain Grosjean (FRA) Lotus F1 Team and Julien Simon-Chautemps (FRA) Lotus F1 Team Race Engineer.
28.02.2015.
(L to R): Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 with Tom McCullough (GBR) Sahara Force India F1 Team Chief Engineer.
27.02.2015.
(L to R): Bradley Joyce (GBR) Sahara Force India F1 Race Engineer with Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1.
27.02.2015.
Mark Slade (GBR), Lotus F1 Team, Race Engineer 
27.02.2015.
Mark Slade (GBR), Lotus F1 Team, Race Engineer 
27.02.2015.
Mark Slade (GBR), Lotus F1 Team, Race Engineer 
27.02.2015.
Aldo Costa (ITA) Mercedes AMG F1 Engineering Director.
26.02.2015.
Gianpiero Lambiase (ITA) Red Bull Racing Engineer.
26.02.2015.
Alex Cinelli (ITA) Ferrari Aerodynamic Engineer (Left).
26.02.2015.
(L to R): Dave Greenwood (GBR) Ferrari Race Engineer with James Allison (GBR) Ferrari Chassis Technical Director.
26.02.2015.
Tom McCullough (GBR) Sahara Force India F1 Team Chief Engineer.
21.02.2015.
Ferrari SF15-T engine cover detail.
21.02.2015.

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


KGBVD - Unregistered

December 13, 2010 9:24 PM

@ TeaBag: you know MotoGP is a different sport right? Let's follow this one through, F1 is also: slower to 60mph than an NHRA dragster, crap on snow compared to a WRC, and useless on sand compared to a rallyraid. An F1 car would also be **** in a Sprintcar race or a RedBull Air race... A lot faster pit stops in F1 than Moto GP though... So they score points there. What else shall we compare? Kangaroos to porcupines?

Essexredneck

December 13, 2010 8:04 PM

@tealeaf you obviously don't remember the last batch of turbocars they sounded like god on his vinegar strokes and raced with at least 50% more BHP than the current cars manage- and as for "struggling to break 200mph" I was there in Austria 1986 when Derek Warwick broke the timing beam at 217mph, in a 1.5 litre four pot turbo. And also, Moto GP bikes acceleration from 50 to 140mph has been demonstrated to be superior to F1 cars already.



© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.