F1 » 15 December 2010
Boullier: Fernandes' Lotus is 'fake...'wrong' to tell fans it isn't
Lotus Renault GP managing director Eric Boullier has hit out at Lotus Racing team principal Tony Fernandes for trying to perpetrate the 'fake' notion that the F1 2010 newcomer has anything to do with the iconic Team Lotus
Eric Boullier has accused his fellow F1 team principal Tony Fernandes of being 'wrong' in his efforts to perpetrate what he calls a 'fake' notion that Lotus Racing is an extension of the iconic Team Lotus that once dominated the sport and conquered the hearts of millions of fans all around the globe.
The ongoing standoff between F1 2010 newcomer Lotus Racing and the team that will soon be rebranded Lotus Renault GP after Proton – the owners of Group Lotus – purchased the remaining 25 per cent of the Renault F1 outfit, remains as unresolved as it has ever been.
The latter's managing director has spoken to Italian website 422race.com to give his take on the embarrassing dispute, and to express his disdain at Fernandes' resilient determination to use the iconic 'Team Lotus' moniker next year, leading to the potentially confusing scenario of two Lotus entries on the F1 2011 starting grid. Boullier insists he is not overly concerned.
“It's difficult to give an opinion on this,” the Frenchman stressed. “There are many people involved in this quarrel. The only thing I know is that Proton decided to invest and to be a sponsor of our team. This makes us the official representative of Lotus. You can try to be called Team Lotus, but at the end there is only one team with the support of Proton and which is therefore representative of Lotus Cars.
“If I can find somebody in England whose name is maybe Richard Ferrari, I can buy the right to use his name – that is how stupid the situation is. It's very bad for the fans, because [Fernandes' Lotus] is fake. Telling the fans about the Lotus heritage and so on is wrong. If you're called Lotus and you're manufacturing cars, then this is the only official name. That's it.”
Assuring that 'nothing will change' either in the management structure or on the commercial side following Proton's arrival since 'Genii [Capital] controls the team', Boullier added that the official renaming will happen in due course before the beginning of the 2011 world championship campaign. He also acknowledged that the Enstone-based operation can gain from the experience and expertise of people like Group Lotus CEO Dany Bahar and sporting director Claudio Berro.
“Sure, we'll benefit as a partner,” he mused. “We actually plan to meet and discuss with them (Group Lotus), but they are currently working with a car manufacturer and they're not in F1. Of course I will be working with them for their experience, but the daily business is run by Genii, not by Lotus Cars. Lotus is just a sponsor and, as the title sponsor, they have the right to be in the team name, as the regulations state – but there will be no commercial change.”
On the topic of the team's second driver for next season, finally, Boullier revealed that there is 'no deadline' and that he is 'not in a hurry' – and insisted he would not be influenced by Bahar's stated desire for Russian rookie Vitaly Petrov to be kept on-board into a second consecutive campaign.
“Again, they are sponsors, they are partners,” he underlined. “They are not deciding who they want. We will keep the driver we believe can bring a full package and a good balance between sporting results and business. It's good if we can match the wish of Dany Bahar, but the decision will be of the team.”
Tagged as: Renault , Claudio Berro , Proton , 2011 , Lotus , Dany Bahar , Tony Fernandes , fernandes , F1 2010 , Eric Boullier , Group Lotus , Lotus Racing , Team Lotus , Boullier , Lotus Renault GP
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Join the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.