F1 »

Lack of innovation, test ban costing Ferrari dear?

The notoriously unforgiving Italian media has accused Ferrari of an absence of imagination in the design of its F150° Italia, with the in-season testing ban similarly hampering the Scuderia's efforts to compete
Ferrari has been accused of a lack of innovation of late for costing the Scuderia its competitive edge in F1, with the testing ban similarly speculated to have played a part in the team's present malaise.

Since clinching both the drivers' and constructors' crowns in 2007 and the constructors' laurels again the following year, there has been no end-of-season silverware for Ferrari in the top flight, with a distant fourth place in the title standings in 2009 and only one spot better in 2010.

Worse still, the F150° Italia has yet to set the world alight in F1 2011 either, with Fernando Alonso lapping the best part of a second-and-a-half slower than early pace-setters Red Bull Racing in qualifying in Australia and China, no starting position higher than the third row of the grid and no finish better than fourth.

Not only is Ferrari's new baby slower than Red Bull's RB7, but it also palpably pales in comparison with the McLaren-Mercedes MP4-26 and has been alternately outpaced by the Lotus Renault GP R31 and Mercedes Grand Prix MGP W02.

Fears were already expressed during pre-season testing that the F150° Italia was too conservative a design in a sport so famous for pushing back the boundaries [see separate story – click here] – and the notoriously impatient and unsympathetic Italian media has been quick to pounce on the problems, with Autosprint denigrating an absence of imagination from the Prancing Horse.

With aerodynamics known to be the principal Achilles' heel, the magazine even muses about a temporary relocation of development activities to Toyota's disused wind tunnel in Cologne to allow for the Maranello facility to be recalibrated – whilst pointing to Ferrari suffering from no longer being able to make use of its two private test tracks following the abolition of in-season testing in F1's new expenditure-conscious era.

'When was the last time another team took advantage of a Ferrari development?' Autosprint asks. 'It was 2008, when the Ferrari had the hole in the nose. Since then, no-one has even tried to emulate Ferrari's ideas.'




Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
16.04.2011- Qualifying, Fernando Alonso (ESP), Scuderia Ferrari, F150
16.04.2011- Qualifying, Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
16.04.2011- Qualifying, Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari, F150
16.04.2011- Qualifying, Fernando Alonso (ESP), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
17.04.2011- Aldo Costa (ITA), Technical Director, Scuderia Ferrari
16.04.2011- Qualifying, Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
16.04.2011- Saturday, Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
16.04.2011- Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
15.04.2011- Friday Practice 2, Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
15.04.2011- Friday Practice 2, Fernando Alonso (ESP), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
15.04.2011- Friday Practice 2, Fernando Alonso (ESP), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
15.04.2011- Friday Practice 2, Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
17.04.2011- Race, Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia leads Fernando Alonso (ESP), Scuderia Ferrari, F-150 Italia
24.07.2014- Marco Mattiacci (ITA) Team Principal, Scuderia Ferrari
24.07.2014- Daniil Kvyat (RUS) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
24.07.2014- Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari F14-T
24.07.2014- Kamui Kobayashi (JAP) Caterham F1 Team CT-04
24.07.2014- Romain Grosjean (FRA) Lotus F1 Team E22

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Skeptical - Unregistered

April 27, 2011 12:11 PM

@Butterfly Alonslow lost because he couldn't get past a Russian rookie in an underperforming car. The testing ban "costing," them is absolutely not true since everyone is in the same situation but managed to adapt. Why The Prancing Horse can't seem to the same is their problem.



© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.