F1 »

Team bosses comment on new UK F1 TV deal

"[However], I think we would welcome interest from other forms of media. The devil, of course, is in the detail. [I'm] mindful that there is a lot of heat in the air about that at the moment, but we just don't know the detail so it would be improper to comment beyond that. But what the fans need and want - and a mass audience - is something we need to pay attention to.

"I am not sufficiently aware of the detail of quite how [it] is going to operate. What I can say is that, if you look at the last two or three years, then F1, whether through the teams' association, or through the FIA, has taken a number of steps to try and keep the racing exciting and grow that audience. I think everything from the fans' forum to the amount of digital content that we are now pushing out into the networks says that we are extremely interested in what the fans are doing. They are the backbone of the global reach that we have and we do listen to them, so I disagree with your first assertion that it is just riding roughshod over that, but I can understand some of the concerns when the detail isn't there."

Renault team boss Eric Boullier, however, claimed that the deal could only be good for the sport.

"With the latest I have been told about this deal, I think it is rather good news," the UK-based Frenchman suggested, "It should be positively welcomed by the fans, even if they have not been maybe calling into a forum to discuss the idea. My understanding is there will be more TV viewers, there will be more access to F1 and F1 will broadcast much more through two different channels that are BBC, on free-to-air, and Sky, so with the latest info I have got it is a good deal, as it is good for F1 and it is definitely much better for fans."

While Sky had expressed an interest in taking up ownership of the sport through News Corp, Ecclestone always insisted that he would not entertain offers from a group that would, potentially, remove the 'free to air' option from television viewers. However, the sport's ringmaster appears to have has given in under the weight of the problems facing the BBC and added the UK to both Germany and Italy in allowing Sky to have the rights to cover F1 live.

Amid concerns that the latest decision could be replicated in other countries, the question of potentially alienating sponsors was raised during Friday's FIA Q&A session, with Lowdon admitting that the sport may have to adapt its current practices.

"The model has to reflect the commercial model of the sport, there can't be a disconnect in the commercial model, it's really quite clear," he noted, "Everything in F1 changes, everything moves forward, so I imagine that the commercial model will as well.

"It's vitally important that the requirements of the fans are reflected in that and I would anticipate that, if there were this kind of move on a global scale instead of one specific market, then the overall model would have to change for the teams, not just to be profitable but to be sustainable and obviously the sustainability of F1 is very important. It's a sport with great tradition and it has a fabulous future and it's important that that future plays out."

Boullier admitted that losing 'free to air' coverage would be detrimental to doing business with sponsors, but insisted that this was not his understanding of the latest deal.

"Based on this business model today, which is only 'free to air', we can obviously sell to the sponsors the great access to fans and TV viewers," he conceded, "If you start to reduce the 'free to air' broadcasting, you obviously have to change the business model and it will affect the sustainability of the sponsorship. In the case of this deal, I think we need to wait to have more details, because my understanding is that it will still be 'free to air' and that there will be better access to F1 for the fans which will, in the end, be much better.

"The added value is that Sky will broadcast much more information and show any reports and that's extra information that we will share with the public and with the fans."

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
26.05.2011- Bernie Ecclestone (GBR), President and CEO of Formula One Management
McLaren Racing managing director Jonathan Neale
Friday Practice 2, atmosphere
10.07.2011- Race, Start of the race
26.03.2017 - Race, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
26.03.2017 - Race, Stoffel Vandoorne (BEL) McLaren MCL32
26.03.2017 - Race, Alain Prost (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Team Special Advisor
26.03.2017 - Race, Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB13 and Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17
26.03.2017 - Race, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32 and Esteban Ocon (FRA) Sahara Force India F1 VJM10
26.03.2017 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17
26.03.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H and Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
26.03.2017 - Race, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32 and Esteban Ocon (FRA) Sahara Force India F1 VJM10
26.03.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 leads Stoffel Vandoorne (BEL) McLaren MCL32
26.03.2017 - Race, Stoffel Vandoorne (BEL) McLaren MCL32 and Antonio Giovinazzi (ITA) Sauber C36
26.03.2017 - Race, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
26.03.2017 - Race, Start of the race, Antonio Giovinazzi (ITA) Sauber C36 and Stoffel Vandoorne (BEL) McLaren MCL32
26.03.2017 - Race, Jolyon Palmer (GBR) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17
26.03.2017 - Race, Jolyon Palmer (GBR) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

ace.moonpanda - Unregistered

July 30, 2011 8:44 AM
Last Edited 2070 days ago

This is just wrong. How can thet say they will get more viewers. I cannot afford sky and am also thinking great i can watch 10 live races.would the bbc say you can watch 10 episodes of eastenders and then make you pay to watch the next 10 i doudt it. gutted.

Dr Thompson

July 30, 2011 8:46 AM
Last Edited 2070 days ago

I don't know how anyone can see anything positive in it? Look at the fan reaction, that is not a good thing for F1 in any way. I was relying on the teams to do something about this. It's their sponsors coverage that will suffer the most after all, isn't it? How does restricting access equal more viewers?

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.